Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 The Faculty of Accounting and Management Department, Islamic Azad University of Eslsmshahr Branch

2 The Faculty of Economics and Management Department, University of Tarbiat Modares

Abstract

Abstract
          Technological evolutions as one of basic resources of productivity growth plays a significant role in economic growth. Therefore, after world war ІІ, the determination of measure and bias of technological change has been subject of many research efforts.
           In this paper we have studied on the trend and bias of technological change in Iran’s industry by econometric approach from 1971 to 2008. We estimated a translog cost function in addition to equations system of cost share, using Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR) approach. The results show that the rate of technological change has been -1.10 percent during the study years. It means that there is a decline in rate of cost of productive units over time. Furthermore, the results indicate that technological change has been biased towards the use of more energy and material, while labor and capital have been saved.

Keywords

- امامی میبدی، علی، اصول اندازه‌گیری بهره‌وری و کارایی، تهران، موسسه مطالعات و پژوهشهای بازرگانی، (1379).
2- امینی، امراله، تخمین و تحلیل تحولات فنی، کارآیی و بهره‌وری در صنعت خودروسازی ایران،  پایان نامه دکتری اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، (1379).
3- بیدرام، رسول، Eviews همگام با اقتصادسنجی،تهران، منشور بهره‌وری، (1381).
4- شرافت، محمد ناصر، بررسی ساختار فن‌آوریک تولید و برآورد تقاضای نهاده‌های تولید، معاونت امور اقتصادی وزارت امور اقتصادی و دارایی، (1375).
5- قره باغیان، مرتضی، اقتصاد و رشد و توسعه، تهران، نشرنی، (1371).
6- قره باغیان، مرتضی و مسعود همایونی فر، آثار تغییرات فنی و نهادی بر‌رشد تولید کشاورزی ایران، فصلنامه اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه، سال نهم، شماره 36 ( زمستان 1380) 44-23.
7- گجراتی، دامودار، مبانی اقتصادسنجی، ترجمه حمید ابریشمی، تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، (1378).
8- مرکز آمار ایران،آمار کارگاههای صنعتی کشور، سالهای مختلف.
9- هایامی، یوجیرو، اقتصاد توسعه- از فقر تا ثروت ملل، ترجمه غلامرضا آزاد ارمکی، تهران،  نشر نی، (1380).
10- Ahmad, S. “On the Theory of Induced Innovation”, Economic Journal, Vol. 76, No. 2 (June 1966): 344-357.  
11- Chambers, R. G. “Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach”, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
12- Datta,A. and S. Christoffersen. “Production Costs, Scale Economies and Technical Change in U.S. Textile and Apparel Industries”, School of Business Administration,Philadelphia university,2004.
13- Hayami, Y. and V. W. Ruttan. “Factor Prices and Technical Change in Agricultural Development:The United States and Japan, 1880-1966”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, No. 5 (September 1970): 1115-1141.
14- Intriligator, M. D. “Embodied Technical Change and Productivity in the United States, 1929-1958”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47, No.1 (February 1965): 65-70.
15- Jorgenson, D. W. “The Embodiment Hypothesis”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 74, No.1 (February 1966): 1-17.
16- Kant, S. and J. C. Nautiyal. “Production Structure, Factor Substitution, Technical Change, and Total Factor Productivity”, Can. J. Forest Research, Vol.27, No.5 (August 1997): 701-710.
17- Machin, S. and J. V. Reenen. “Technology and Changes in Skill Structure: Evidence from Seven      OECD Countries”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,Vol.113, No.4 (November 1998): 1215-1244.
18- McCarthy, M. D. “Embodied and Disembodied Technical Progress in the Constant Elasticity of Substitution Production Function”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47, No. 1 (February 1965): 71-75.
19- Rasmussen, S. “Technological Change and Economies of Scale in Danish Agriculture”, The Royal eterinary and Agricultural University KVL, Copenhagen, 2000.
20- Romer, P. M. “ Endogenous Technological change”, Journal of politiocal Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5 (October 1990): 71-102.
21- Solow, R. M. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”, Review of Economics and  Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 3 (August 1957): 312-320.
22-Stevenson, R. “Measuring Technological Bias”, American Economic Review, Vol. 70, No.1 (March 1980): 162-173.
23- Thirtle, C., R. Townsend and J. Van Zyl. “ Testing the Induced Innovation Hypothesis: An Error Correction Model of South African Agriculture”, Agricultural Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1 (September 1998): 145-157.