Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Sharif University of Technology

3 Master of Economics at National Iranian Competition Center

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the level of monopoly in petrochemical products of Iran and the fluctuations of price using the trading data of these products in Iran Mercantile Exchange (IME). Considering the level of monopoly in this market, we are looking for a solution that lowers the gap between price and quantity of current market with those of perfect competition market. Our solution is termed “Guarantee” which is a kind of security that is issued in a quantity that equates supply to market demand in the next period. This creates a two-stage game in which we satisfy the expectations for the demand of second stage in the first stage. We develop a model and show that in this solution, the equilibrium will have lower price and higher quantity in which only the shocks of the second stage are affecting equilibrium price and quantity. Thus, in a situation without an unexpected shock, the price and quantity of market will be equal to those of perfect competition equilibrium. Moreover, we examine the underlying prediction of this new tool by analyzing the performance of an existing security called “Salaf”. These two have the nature of future trading in common and our empirical test show that introducing “Salaf” lowers prices, as predicted by theory.

Keywords

گزارش شرکت ملی صنایع پتروشیمی در ارتباط با تاریخچه عرضه و تقاضای محصولات پتروشیمی، (1395) ارائه شده در وزارت نفت.
گزارش شرکت بورس کالای ایران در موضوع عرضه محصولات پتروشیمی در سال 1393، (1394)، ارائه شده در وزارت صنعت، معدن و تجارت.
 
Allaz, B. (1992), “Oligopoly, Uncertainty and Strategic Forward Transactions”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10(2), 297-308.
Allaz, B., and J. L. Vila (1993), “Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency”, Journal of Economic Theory, 59(1), 1-16.
 Anderson, R. W. (1991), “Futures Trading for Imperfect Cash Markets: A Survey”, In Commodity, Futures and Financial Markets (pp. 207-248), Springer Netherlands.
Anderson, R., and M. Sundaresan (1983), Futures markets and monopoly (No. 63), Center for the Study of Futures Markets, Columbia Business School, Columbia University.
Coase, R. H. (1972), “Durability and Monopoly”, The Journal of Law & Economics, 15(1), 143-149.
Ito, Koichiro, and Mar Reguant (2016), “Sequential Markets, Market Power, and Arbitrage”, The American Economic Review 106.7 (2016): 1921-1957.
Krattenmaker, T. G., R. H. Landen and S.C. Salop (1987), “Monopoly Power and Market Power in Antitrust Law”, Geo. Lj, 76, 241.
Kumar, P. and D. J. Seppi (1992), “Futures Manipulation with “Cash Settlement””, The Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1485-1502.
Liston-Hayes, C and A. Pilkington (2004), “Inventive Concentration: An Analysis of Fuel Cell Patents”, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 31, No. 1, p.15-25.
Muermann, A., and S. H. Shore (2005), “Spot Market Power and Futures Market Trading”, Available at SSRN 681202.
Slade, M. E., and H. Thille (2006), “Commodity Spot Prices: An Exploratory Assessment of Market Structure and Forward‐Trading Effects”, Economica, 73(290), 229-256.