Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 MA Alumnus, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Kharazmi University

3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba'i University

Abstract

One of the issues in complex organizations is management of personnel movements. On the one hand, personnel tend to change their positions from one sector of organization to another part or from one post to another post or move to another branch of the organization in a new city. On the other hand, administrators reposition personnel inside an organization to avoid burnout and facilitate dynamic improvement of the organization. But internal movement inside an organization is faced with challenges, such that it should not cause any posts to be vacant and this requires access to a great deal of information about human resources of the organization and the need to processing them. In this study, we propose an algorithm using market design theory that permits managers to efficiently manage internal movement of human resources. This algorithm was developed by TTCC method and programmed in C# language. To demonstrate the accuracy of proposed algorithm, we applied it to a hypothetical organization with 2325 personnel, 155 branches and 400 internal movement requests. Simulation shows that proposed algorithm increases internal movement of human resources by 11% and help human resource management of organization to be more effective.

Keywords

نصیری اقدم، علی، محمدجواد رضائی و مهدی موحدی بکنظر (1393)، «طراحی بازار؛ چارچوب تحلیلی «راث» در درک عملکرد بازار»، مجلس و راهبرد، دوره 21، ش 79، صص 123-151.
 
Abbassi, Z., N. Haghpanah and V. Mirrokni (2013), “Exchange Market Mechanisms without Money”, ACM Journal Name.
Abdulkadiroglu and Sonmez (2003), “School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach”, American Economic Review, 93, 729-747.
Abdulkadiroglu (2005), “College Admissions with Affirmative Action”, International Journal of Game Theory, 33(4), 535-549.
Abdulkadiroglu, A. P., Parag, Alvin Roth and Tayfun Sonmez (2006), “Changing the Boston School Choice Mechanism”, NBER Working Paper No. 11965
Anderson, R., I. Ashlagi, D. Gamarnik and Y. Kanoria (2014), “A Dynamic Model of Barter Exchange”, Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, Pages 1925-1933
Baccara, M., A. Collard-Wexler, L. Felli  and L. Yariv (2013), “Child-Adoption Matching: Preferences for Gender and Race”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6 (3): 133-58. DOI: 10.1257/app.6.3.133
Becker, G. S., and J.J Elias (2007), “Introducing Incentives in the Market for Live and Cadaveric Organ Donations”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 21(summer), p. 3-24.
Gale, D., and Shapely (1962), “College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage”, The American Mathematical Monthly, 69, 9-15.
Kojima and Kamada (2010), “Improving Efficiency in Matching Markets with Regional Caps: The Case of the Japan Residency Matching Program”.
Roth. A. A. (1982), “The Economics of Matching: Stability and Incentives”, Mathematics of Operations Research, 7(4), 617-628.
Roth, A. A. (1984), “The Evolution of the Labor Market for Medical Interns and Residents: A Case Study in Game Theory”, Journal of Political Economy, 929(6), 991-1016.
Roth, A. A. (2000), Game Theory as a Tool for Market Design In Game Practice: Contributions from Applied Game Theory, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 7-18.
Roth, A. A. (2002), “The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics”, Econometrica, 70(4), 1341-1378.
Roth, A. A. and Niederle (2005), “The Gastroenterology Fellowship Market: Should there be a Match?”, American Economic Review, 95(2), 372-375.
Roth, A. A. and Peranson (1999), “The Redesign of the Matching Market for American Physicians: Some Engineering Aspects of Economic Design”, American Economic Review, 89, 748-780.
Roth, A. A., Sonmez and Unver (2003), Kidney Exchange, NBER Working Paper.
Roth, A. A., Sonmezand Unver (2004), “Kidney Exchange”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119.
Roth, A. A., Sonmez and Unver (2007), “Efficient Kidney Exchange: Coincidence of Wants in Markets with Compatibility-Based Preferences”, The American Economic Review, 97(3), 828-851.
Shapley and Scarf (1974), “On Cores and Ewmsibility”, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 23-37.
Slaugh, V. W., M. Akan, O. Kesten, and M. U. Unver (2016). “The Pennsylvania Adoption Exchange improves its matching process”, Interfaces 46 (2), 133–153