The Importance of Composition of Assets and Liabilities in Determining Banking Supervision Ratings

Ahmadian, AZAM

doi:10.22054/joer.2017.7848

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

AZAM ahmadian

PhD in Economics and Researcher of Banking Department, Monetary and Banking Research Institute

https://doi.org/10.22054/joer.2017.7848

Abstract

The aim of this study is assessment of the combination of asset and liability on the banking supervision ratings. In this paper Camels Rating model is used for banking supervision rating. Also, by using financial statements of Iranian bank for the period 2006-2014 and ordinal regression method, we have investigated the effect of composition of the portfolio's assets and liabilities on banks’ ratings. The results of model validity, significance of regression and the prediction power tests show that the model is correct and it is suitability for future analysis and the predictive power of the model is 89 percent. The results show that the riskier the asset portfolio, the less likely the banks to be ranked higher in future periods and the more the probability of losing banks’ ratings in future periods. In addition, the more the share of stable sources in banks’ portfolio of liabilities, the higher the probability of having better ratings and the less the probability of losing banks’ ratings in future periods.

Keywords

References

احمدیان، اعظم (1393)، «رتبه بندی بانک‌ها در چارچوب کملز»، همایش بیست و چهارم سیاست‌های پولی و ارزی، پژوهشکده پولی و بانکی.

گرونینگ، هنی ون و سونیا براجوویچ (2003)، تجزیه و تحلیل و مدیریت ریسک بانکی: چارچوبی برای ارزیابی راهبری شرکتی و ریسک مالی، مترجم: حسن بختیاری و بهروز خدارحمی، تهران: موسسه عالی بانکداری ایران،1390،ص80.

Anonymous, (2007), “SPSS Base 16.0 for Windows User's Guide”, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, 527 p.

Bellotti, T., R. Matousek and C. Stewart (2011), “Are Rating Agencies’ Assignments Opaque? Evidence from International Banks”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4206-4214.

Booth, G. G. and P. E. Koveos. (1986), “A Programming Model for Bank Hedging Decisions”, The Journal of Financial Research 9 (3): 271-79.

Brodt, A. I. (1978), “A Dynamic Balance Sheet Management Model for a Canadian Chartered Bank”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 2: 221-41.

Cole, R., A. Gunther and W. Jeffery (1995), “Separating Likelihood and Timing of Bank Failure)”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 19: 1073-1089.

Evanoff, D. D. and L. D. Wall (2001), “Measures of the Riskiness of Banking Organizations: Subordinated Debt Yields, Risk-Based Capital, and Examination Ratings”, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Paper 2001-25.

Fielitz, B. D. and T. A. Loe_er (1979), “A Linear Programming Model for Commercial Bank Liquidity Management”, Financial Management 8: 41-50.

Giokas, D. and M. Vassiloglou (1991), “A Goal Programming Model for Bank Assets and Liabilities Management”, European Journal of Operational Research, 50: 48-60.

Gogas, P., T. Papadimitriou and A. Agrapetidou (2014), “Forecasting Bank Credit Ratings”, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2395798.

Grubmann, N. (1987), “BESMOD: A Strategic Balance Sheet Simulation Model”, European Journal of Operational Research, 30: 30-4.

Hirtle, B. J. and J. A. Lopez (1999) “Supervisory Information and the Frequency of Bank Examinations”, FRBNY economic policy review, 1-19.

Kosmidou, K. and C. Zopounidis (2002), “An Optimization Scenario Methodology for Bank Asset Liability Management”, Operational Research, 2 (2): 279-87.

Kusy, M. I. and W. T. Ziemba (1986), “A Bank Asset and Liability Management Model”, Operations Research, 34 (3): 356-76.

Morgan, D. P. and A. B. Ashcraft (2003), “Using Loan Rates to Measure and Regulate Bank Risk: Findings and an Immodest Proposal”, Journal of Financial Services Research, 24(2): 181-200.

O_guzsoy, C. B. and S. Guven (1997), “Bank Asset and Liability Management under Uncertainty”, European Journal of Operational Research, 102: 575-600.

Peresetsky, A. and A. Karminsky (2008), “Models for Moody’s bank rating”, BOFIT Discussion Papers 17, Bank of Finland, BOFIT, Institute for Economies in transition.

Ryan, R. J. and F. J. Fabozzi (2002), “Rethinking Pension Liabilities and Asset Allocation: A Pension Crisis Looms”, Journal of Portfolio Management, 28, 7-15.

Simonson, D. G., J. D. Stowe and C. J. Watson (1983), “A Canonical Correlation Analysis of Commercial Bank Asset/Liability Structures”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 18 (1): 125-40.

Society of Actuaries (SOA) (2003), “Professional Actuarial Specialty Guide: Asset-Liability Management”, Available at <www.soa.org/library/professional-actuarial specialtyguides/ professional-actuarial-specialty guides/2003/september/ spg0308alm.pdf>.

Whalen, G. (1999), “A Proportional Hazards Model of Bank Failure: An Examination of Its Usefulness as an Early Warning Tool”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Review, 1991, Quarter 1 – pages 9-20.

Economics Research

The Importance of Composition of Assets and Liabilities in Determining Banking Supervision Ratings

References

References

Volume 17, Issue 65 - Serial Number 2
July 2017
Pages 115-142

The Importance of Composition of Assets and Liabilities in Determining Banking Supervision Ratings

References

References

Volume 17, Issue 65 - Serial Number 2July 2017Pages 115-142

Volume 17, Issue 65 - Serial Number 2
July 2017
Pages 115-142