Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The present article discusses the impacts of selecting between different common auctions in electricity markets (system marginal price auction and pay as bid auction) on production efficiency, total efficiency and average expected price in an asymmetric information situation, where each player’s information about the marginal cost of the competitor is incomplete. A simple model is designed to conduct the comparative study of alternative auction mechanisms. The model is based on two profit maximizing players, with full information about their own marginal cost and incomplete information about their competitor. Assumptions which have been used to construct the model are based on Iran’s electricity market structure. The outcome indicates that although players bid functions in alternative auction mechanism differ from each other, the production efficiency, total efficiency and the average expected price are equivalent. 

Keywords

                Bower J, Bunn D W (2001), Experimental analysis of the efficiency of uniform-price versus.Jornal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25:3-4
 Cramton, P. (2004); Auction Design and Strategy: Principles and Practice; Market Design Inc.; University of Maryland, 2004.
 Federico G., Rahman, D (2003), Bidding in an Electricity Pay-as-Bid Auction; Journal of Regulatory Economics; 24:2.
 Genc, Talat (2007), Discriminatory versus Uniform-Price Auctions with Supply Function Equilibrium; University of Guelph.
 Hudson, R. (2000); Analysis of Uniform and Discriminatory Price Auctions in Restructured Electricity Markets; Energy Division Oak National Laboratory Oak Ridge; Tennessee.
 Kahn, Alfred, E. et al (2001), Uniform Pricing or Pay-as-Bid Pricing: A Dilemma for California and Beyond; The Electricity Journal.
Laffer, Arthur B. and Patrick N. Giordano (2005), Exelon Rex, Will power deregulation in Illinois benefit consumers or utilities?, Wall Street Journal.
 Lawrence M. Ausubel, Peter Cramton (2010), Using forward markets to improve electricity market design; Utilities Policy, vol. 18 195e200.
 Mount, Timothy (1999), Market Power and Price Volatility in Restructured Markets for Electricity; IEEE Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; Maui, Hawaii.
 Peter Cramton (2004), Competitive Bidding Behavior in Uniform-Price Auction Markets; Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
 Peter Cramton (2003), Electricity Market Design: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly; Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
 Rassenti, S et al (2001), Discriminatory Price Auctions in Electricity Markets: Low Volatility at the Expense of High Price Levels; George Mason University.
 Tierney, S.F et al (2008), Uniform Pricing versus Pay-as-Bid in Wholesale Electricity Markets: Does it Make a Difference?, Analysis Group and New York Independent System Operator.