Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Population size and its change have enormous effects on economic growth and development. In this respect vast amounts of researches in economics are devoted to population studies. Malthus theory of population is regarded as a core in population issues, which had created a pessimistic view on population and its impact on economy, while Malthus theory were challenged by many and specially by Verlhurst, which the latter theory actually outmoded Malthus’ and gained replacement, it is wondering how in the annals of science the Verlhurst theory is forbidden and how there is a consistent acknowledgment of failed pessimistic view of Malthus on population.
In this respect, this paper tries to reconsider Malthus and Neo-Malthusian views on population. And also, neglected Verlhust view from a limited institutional approach.  For this purpose, the study of impact of the institutions (like authority and observance of law,       economic freedom,..) and  their improvements on populations receives due attention.
In this research we also, in spite of recent Neo-Malthusian views, we pay attention to the positive impacts of population on economic growth. The view which in recent years gained wide acceptance and their followers are expanding rapidly in various academies,   Research used method. In this study is descriptive and authors purposes a reconsideration long growth positive effects of population rather than short run negative effects in economic planning.

1. Avery John. "Malthus' Essay on the Principle of Population"., Retrieved (Sept.6 2005)  from http://www.esp.org/books/malthus/population/malthus.pdf.
 
2. Barro, Robert J and Gary S.Becker. "Fertility Choice in  A Model of Economic Growth"., Econometrica, 57(2), (1989).
 
3. Barro, Robert J and Xavier Sala-i-Marlin. Economic Growth. Second Edition, New York: Mc Graw- Hill., 2004.
 
4. Douglas C.North. Economic Performance through Time: the Limits Knowledge. Retrieved, Sept.4, 2005.
from:http://econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/eh/pape r/9612/9612004.pdf.
 
5. Gwarteny, James, Robert Lawson and Walter Block. Economic Freedom of the World. Vancover, Bc: Fraser Institute., 1996.
 
6. Jones Charles I. "Population and Ideas: A Theory of Endogenous Growth"., Retrieved, (May.4, 2005), from: http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~chad/pop500.pdf
 
7. Knack, Stephen and Philip Keefer. "Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative International Measures"., Economic and Politics,No.7, (1995).
 
8. Mukhopadhyay Ashoke. Malthus' Population Theory An Irony in the Annals of Science. Retrieved, (January.7,2005), from: http:// www.e e.iit kgp.er net.in /~so u m I tro/bt/archives/malthus.pdf.
 
9. Norton Seth w. Population Growth, Economic Freedom, and The Rule of Law., Reterieved, (March 18, 2005), from http://www.perc.org/pdf/ps24.pdf.
 
10. PRS Group,Inc. "International Country Risk Guide"., East Syracuse,NY. (2002), Available: http://www.prsgroup.com/icrg/icrg.html.
 
11. Oded Galon and  David n.Weill. Population, Technology and Growth: From the Malthusian Regime to Demographic Transition. Reterieved, (May14, 2005), from http://www.econ.brown.edu/faculty/weil/working/pdfs/gwaugust19.pdf
 
12. Phelps Edmond S. "Models of Technical Progress and the Golden Rule of Research".,  Review of Economic Studies, No.33, (1966).
 
13. World Bank. World Development Indicators, CD-Rom. Washington,DC., 2001.