Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to investigate the possibility of a regional block implementation including Iran and other Middle East countries, and also it’s effect on trade relation and income convergence among members. Accordingly, a trade gravity model is specified in which economic structures of all trading partners and their social and cultural relations as well as integration and geographical distance explain trade flows and income convergence. We, therefore, use economic datas of 12 Iran’s trading partners in the region over 1993-2003 to estimate the models (both trade and convergence) by the panel data procedure.
The empirical results indicate that trade integration between Iran and  Middle East countries has a positive and significant effect on their trade relations, whereas trade expansion cannot convergence their incomes significantly.

1. جعفری، عباس. گیتاشناسی نوین کشورها. تهران: مؤسسه جغرافیایی و کارتوگرافی گیتا شناسی، 1382.
2. جرالد ام. مایر. فضای بین المللی تجارت (رقابت و حاکمیت در اقتصاد جهانی). ترجمة علی حبیبی، تهران: سازمان مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی کشور، معاونت امور پشتیبانی. مرکز مدارک علمی و انتشارات، 1382.
3. زاهد طلبان، علی. «منطقه گرایی در نظام تجاری چند جانبه». مجله بررسیهای بازرگانی، شماره 2، (1382).
4. کریمی هسنیجه، حسین. «جهانی شدن، یکپارچگی اقتصادی و مناسبترین ترتیبات تجاری- منطقه­ای برای اقتصاد ایران(فرصتها و چالش­ها)». پایان نامه جهت اخذ درجه دکتری رشته علوم اقتصادی، دانشگاه اصفهان، (1382).
 
5. Arnon, A. & et al. "The Potential for Trade between Israel, the Palestinians & Jordan"., The World Economy, No. 19, (1996): 113-133.
 
6. Baltagi. B.H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Wiley and Sons., 1995.
 
7. Batra. A. India’s Global Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach. India Habitat Center: Lodi Road. New Delhi., (2004).
www.icrier.org,website2.www.icrier.resin.
 
8. Cheney. D. "International Issues Prominet at AEA Meeting"., IMF Survey, (1996).
 
9. Evans, P. "Using Panel Data to Evaluate Growth Theories"., International Economic Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, (1998): 295–306.
 
10. Evans, P. and G. Karras. "Convergence Revisited"., Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 37, (1996): 249–265.
 
11. Frankel, J. & et al. "Trading Blocks & Americans: The Natural, the Unnatural & the Supper- Natural"., The Development Economics. No. 47, (1997): 61-95.
 
12. Gujarati, D.N. Basic Econometrics. New York: City University of New York., 2003.
 
13. Harmsen, R.& Leidy, M. "Regional Trading Arrangement. The Uruguay Round and Beyond"., Background Papers. Vol.2, (1994).
 
14. Hoa, T. V. "Growth of Asian Regional Trade and Income Convergence: Evidence from ASEAN+3 Based on Extended Helpman- Krugman Hypothesis and Flexible Modelling Approach"., Economic Working Paper Series, (2003), p.4.
 
15. Krugman, P. Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge MA., (1991).
 
16. Leamer, E. E. and Levinsohn, J. International Trade Theory: the Evidence. in R. W. Jones and P. B. Kenen, Vol. 3, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publisher., 1996.
 
17. Poyhonen. P. "A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries"., Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, No. 90, (1963).
 
18. Slaughter, M. J. "International Trade and Per-Capita Income Convergence: A Difference-in-Difference Analysis, National Bureau of Economic Research"., NBER Working Paper, (1998).
 
19. Tinbergen. J. Shaping the World Economy. Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. The Twentieth Century Fund. New York., 1962.
 
20. World Development Indicators, World Bank. (2005).
 
21. Zarzoso, I. and Lehman, F. N. "Augmented Gravity Model: An Emprical Application to Mercosur- European Union Trade Flows"., Journal of Applied Economics, No.6, (2003).