Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in Economics, Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Economics, Institute for Management and Planning Studies and Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

3 PhD in Economics, Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran

4 Professor, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

 This study investigates labor market shocks in Iran using quarterly data from 2009 to 2022, employing a Bayesian sign-restricted Structural Vector Autoregression (SVAR) model to disentangle supply and demand shocks. The analysis evaluates the effects of monetary policy on these shocks across the aggregate economy and three key sectors: industry, services, and agriculture. The real exchange rate is included as a control variable. The findings reveal heterogeneous responses to monetary policy across sectors. An expansion in the money supply positively affects labor demand in the industrial sector but negatively impacts it in agriculture. Moreover, interest rate reductions have a more pronounced employment-enhancing effect in industry compared to other sectors. In contrast, inflationary pressures dominate labor demand dynamics in agriculture and services. On the supply side, monetary shocks exert a negative effect on labor supply in agriculture—unlike in other sectors—likely due to persistently low wages, which reduce workers’ willingness to increase hours and encourage sectoral migration during inflationary episodes.
Introduction
The examination of Iran's labor market in recent years is of particular significance due to the young population, high labor supply, and lack of proportional demand growth, especially since the unemployment rate has consistently been above 10% from 1388 to 1398 (2009–2019), peaking at 14.7% in 1390 (2011). The decline in the share of employment in the agricultural sector and its shift to the industrial sector is another notable development in Iran's labor market over the past decade. Another current reality of Iran's labor market is the reduction in the economically active population, which has experienced significant fluctuations over the past ten years, dropping from 47.7% in 1384 (2005) to 41% in 1401 (2022). Analyzing this issue requires an examination of supply-side labor policies. Therefore, distinguishing the policy effects on the supply and demand sides of Iran's labor market appears essential for providing precise analyses.
Methods and Materials
In this study, supply and demand shocks are first decomposed, and then the effects of monetary policies on these supply and demand shocks in the labor market are examined using the results of this decomposition. The aim of this research is to separate supply and demand shocks, and given the macroeconomic nature of the question, it is necessary to employ macro econometric methods. Among the available methods, the use of the Structural Vector Autoregression (SVAR) model has been selected, and the model is identified using the sign restriction method, which is a modern approach for identifying coefficients and is defensible under methodological assumptions. This research utilizes the method proposed by Baumeister and Hamilton (2015) to identify supply and demand shocks in each sector. This method can be implemented in any market with available data on prices and quantities.
In SVAR models with sign restrictions, structural shocks are identified by imposing constraints on the signs of impulse responses (e.g., a positive demand shock increases both output and prices, while a positive supply shock increases output but decreases prices). Thus, structural decomposition is performed based on the applied sign restrictions. The process is as follows: first, a reduced-form VAR model is fitted to the data to obtain reduced-form parameters (coefficients and errors). Then, sign restrictions are applied to the estimated coefficients to enable their use in identifying structural shocks. This involves sampling rotation matrices that satisfy the sign restrictions on impulse responses. Finally, the time series of structural shocks are recovered by transforming the reduced-form errors using the identified structural transformation matrix. Labor market shocks were decomposed into supply and demand components using the sign restriction method within an SVAR framework, with parameter distribution updates conducted through Bayesian estimation. Subsequently, the real effect of money supply growth on the decomposed supply and demand labor shocks was analyzed using a panel model, with the exchange rate included as a control variable. The results of the model indicate that an increase in money supply has a positive effect on labor demand in the industrial sector across seasonal lags, while it has a negative effect in the agricultural sector.
Using the Household Expenditure and Income Survey, monthly household-level wages from 1388 to 1401 (2009–2022) were extracted, applying the current weighting aligned with the sampling weights of the Statistical Centre of Iran. Subsequently, wage data were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to obtain real wages. Since wages are collected monthly in this survey, the wage data were aggregated quarterly and classified into three economic sectors: agriculture, industry, and services, based on ISIC codes. Additionally, the number of working hours in the private sector was extracted quarterly from the Labor Force Survey data of the Statistical Centre of Iran at the household level for the years 1388 to 1401 (2009–2022). The data were then aggregated and integrated at the quarterly level, categorized by economic sectors according to ISIC codes. The growth rate of real wages and working hours has been calculated on a quarterly basis, and the analyses have been conducted using private sector data. Money supply data were extracted on a quarterly basis from the time series data of the Central Bank, and exchange rate data were obtained from the Gold, Coin, and Currency Information Network for the period from 1388 to 1401 (2009–2022). For the exchange rate, the data from the middle month of each quarter were used as a representative of the quarterly data.
Results and Discussion
In summary, a 1% increase in money supply leads to a 0.21% reduction in labor demand and a 0.15% reduction in labor supply in the agricultural sector. Additionally, a 1% increase in money supply results in a 0.09% increase in labor demand and a 0.16% increase in labor supply in the industrial sector. These findings collectively suggest that the interest rate reduction channel has a greater impact on increasing employment in industrial firms. In contrast, the inflationary effect dominates labor demand in the agricultural and service sectors. Concurrently, the exchange rate has the most significant negative impact on labor demand in the industrial sector and the least negative impact in the agricultural sector, indicating that the industrial sector is more affected by exchange rate fluctuations. On the labor supply side, only in the agricultural sector, due to low wage levels and despite the inflationary increase resulting from the money supply shock, individuals’ willingness to work decreases, leading to their migration to other economic sectors, such as industry and services.
The results of this study indicate the impact of inflation on the labor market, particularly in the agricultural sector. Accordingly, policymakers are recommended to focus on reducing inflation as a tool to improve labor market conditions on the supply side. Given the evident exodus of labor from the agricultural sector, as clearly observed in the results of this study, it is suggested that governing institutions prioritize implementing more supportive policies for this sector. Furthermore, considering the effectiveness of monetary policy through the interest rate reduction channel in the industrial sector, it is necessary to adopt appropriate policies to strengthen lending capacity in this sector to improve demand-side labor market conditions. The use of credit data and the impact of government fiscal policies for a more precise analysis of decomposed supply and demand labor shocks could be considered in future research.

Keywords

احسانی، محمد علی، کشاورز، هادی، کشاورز، مسعود. (1396). تاثیر سیاست‌های پولی و مالی بر نوسانات اشتغال با تاکید بر اشتغال بخش خصوصی. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 7(26)، 125-144.
 DOR: 20.1001.1.22285954.1396.7.26.8.8
دانش‌جعفری، داود، سردار شهرکی، علی اثنی عشری، هاجر حاتمی، یحیی. (1392). تاثیر تکانه‌های نرخ ارز بر چالش‌ها و چشم اندازهای اشتغال بخش صنعتی ایران. فصلنامه سیاست‌های راهبردی و کلان، 1(1)، 93-104.
 DOI: 10.30507/jmsp.2013.3271
رسولی، محمد، ابریشمی، حمید، مهرآرا، محسن، اصفهانیان، هما. (1399). پیش‌بینی نحوه اثرگذاری سیاست‫های پولی و مالی بر نرخ بیکاری در اقتصاد ایران. فصلنامه تحقیقات اقتصادی، ۵۵(۲)، ۳۲۱-۳۴۵.
DOI: 10.22059/jte.2020.77896
روستایی شلمانی، خیزران، علمی، زهرا میلا. (1398). تخمین کشش تقاضای نیروی کار در کارگاه‌های صنعتی ایران با رویکرد پانل پروبیت کسری. پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، 23(91)، 1-30.
 DOR: 20.1001.1.17350794.1398.23.91.1.7
زروکی، شهریار، علمی، زهرا میلا، یوسفی بارفروشی، آرمان. (۱۳۹۸). تحلیل اثر نامتقارن نرخ‌ارز بر اشتغال در ایران با تاکید بر بخش‌های اقتصادی. فصلنامه پژوهش‌ها وسیاست‌های اقتصادی، ۲۷(۹۰)، ۲۷۷-۳۱۲.
شاکری بستان آباد، رضا، جلیلی، زهرا، صالحی کمرودی، محسن. (1398). تاثیر منطقه‌ای سیاست پولی بر اشتغال استان‌های صنعتی ایران: رهیافت مدل خود رگرسیونی برداری عامل افزوده ساختاری (SFAVAR). فصلنامه پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 9(35)، 79-102.
 DOI: 10.30473/egdr.2019.43550.5013
صمصامی، حسین، اردیزی، حسن. (1398). نرخ ارز و تقاضای نیروی کار در کارگاه‌های صنعتی ایران. دوفصلنامه علمی مطالعات و سیاست‌های اقتصادی، 6(1)، 225-244.
طایی، حسن (۱۳۸۵). تابع عرضه نیروی کار؛ تحلیلی بر پایه داده‌های خرد. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران، ۸(۲۹)، ۹۳-۱۱۲.
عبدالهی آرانی، مصعب، قاسمی، محمدرضا، صفاکیش، محمد. (۱۳۹۶). بررسی تاثیر تکانه‌های سیاست‌های پولی و مالی بر بخش صنعت ایران: دوره ۱۳۹۵۱۳۸۳ (رهیافت SVAR)، فصلنامه پژوهشنامه اقتصاد و برنامه‌ریزی، ۲۲(۳)، ۱۴۰-۱۰۹.
 DOR: 20.1001.1.22519092.1396.22.3.1.0
فرج ‌نیا، سلمان، یوسفی، کوثر، فدایی، مهدی. (1399). مدل‌سازی نرخ بیکاری در ایران: بیکاری ساختاری، تغییرات اشتغال بخشی و سیاست پولی پیش‌بینی‌نشده. فصلنامه پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، 20(78)، 213-۲۵۲.
DOI: 10.22054/joer.2020.12365
فرزام، وحید، طالقانی، فاطمه، خیل کردی، ربابه. (1395). تاثیر جهش پولی نرخ ارز بر اشتغال بخش‌های کشاورزی، صنعت و خدمات در ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران، 21(67)، 83-112.
DOI: 10.22054/ijer.2016.7237
کازرونی، علی رضا، محمدزاده، پرویز، حقیقت، جعفر، تیموری الله‌لو، سجاد. (۱۳۹۸). اثر تکانه‌های پولی بر اشتغال تحت رژیم‌های ارزی در ایران: رویکرد DSGE. مجله اقتصاد و تجارت نوین، ۱۴(۲)، ۱۰۴-۷۷.
لشکری، محمد، بهنامه، مهدی، حسنی، ملیحه. (1395). اثر نااطمینانی نرخ ارز واقعی بر اشتغال در بخش خدمات ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 6(23)، 130-115.
 DOR: 20.1001.1.22285954.1395.6.23.7.4
محمدی مجد سهیل، مهرآرا محسن، برخورداری دورباش، سجاد، نگین تاجی، زریر، هاشم‌نژاد اقدم، نادر. (۱۴۰۲). اثر نامتقارن سیاست‌های پولی بر بیکاری در ایران. نشریه اقتصاد و بانکداری اسلامی، ۱۲(۴۴)، ۲۹-۷.
نظرى، محسن، گوهریان، فاطمه. (1381). بررسی اثر متغیرهای سیاست پولی بر اشتغال به تفکیک بخش‌های عمده اقتصادی در ایران (78-1345). فصلنامه تحقیقات اقتصادی، 37(1)، ۲۰۷-۱۸۷.
 DOR: 20.1001.1.00398969.1381.37.1.6.1
Abdollahi Arani, M., Ghasemi, M. R., & Safa Kish, M. (2017). Investigating the impact of monetary and fiscal policy shocks on Iran's industrial sector: 1383-1395 period (SVAR approach). Quarterly Journal of Economic and Planning Research, 22(3), 109-140. DOR: 20.1001.1.22519092.1396.22.3.1.0 [In Persian].
Baumeister, C., & Hamilton, J.  D.  (2015).  Sign restrictions, structural vector autoregressions, and useful prior information.  Econometrica, 83(5), 1963-1999. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA12356
Bergman, N., Born, B., Matsa, D.  A., & Weber, M.  (2022).  Inclusive monetary policy: How tight labor markets facilitate broad-based employment growth (No.  w29651).  National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI:  10.3386/w29651
Bergman, N., Matsa, D.  A., & Weber, M.  (2020).  Heterogeneous labor market effects of monetary policy.  Chicago Booth Research Paper
(21-02).
Bhorat, H., Tian, N., & Ellyne, M.  (2014).  The real exchange rate and sectoral employment in South Africa (No.  201404).
Burya, A., Mano, R.  C., Timmer, Y., & Weber, A.  (2022).  Monetary Policy under Labor Market Power (No.  2022-2128).  International Monetary Fund. DOI: 10.5089/9798400211812.001
Cantore, C., Ferroni, F., Mumtaz, H., & Theophilopoulou, A.  (2022).  A tail of labor supply and a tale of monetary policy.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4156171
Chen, M.  R., & Dao, M.  (2011).  The real exchange rate and employment in China.  International Monetary Fund.
DOI: 10.5089/9781455269464.001
Chen, S., Igan, D., Lee, D.  Q., & Mishra, P.  (2024).  Inflation and Labor Markets: A Bottom-Up View. DOI: 10.5089/9798400291807.001
Christoffel, K., Kuester, K., & Linzert, T.  (2009).  The role of labor markets for euro area monetary policy.  European Economic Review, 53(8), 908-936.
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.04.007
Danesh Jafari, D., Sardar Shahrokhi, A. E., Hatami, H., & Yahyaei, Y. (2013). The impact of exchange rate shocks on challenges and prospects of employment in Iran's industrial sector. Quarterly Journal of Macro and Strategic Policies, 1(1), 93-104. DOI: 10.30507/jmsp.2013.3271 [In Persian].
Demir, F.  (2010).  Exchange rate volatility and employment growth in developing countries: Evidence from Turkey. World Development, 38(8), 1127-1140. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.019
Dhasmana, A.  (2015).  Real exchange rate volatility and employment: Role of external sector exposure.  IIM Bangalore Research Paper, (479).
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2564427
Ehsani, M. A., Keshavarz, H., & Keshavarz, M. (2017). The impact of monetary and fiscal policies on employment fluctuations with emphasis on private sector employment. Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 7(26), 125-144. DOR: 20.1001.1.22285954.1396.7.26.8.8 [In Persian].
Faraj Nia, S., Yousefi, K., & Fadaei, M. (2020). Modeling the unemployment rate in Iran: Structural unemployment, sectoral employment changes, and unanticipated monetary policy. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 20(78), 213-252. DOI: 10.22054/joer.2020.12365 [In Persian].
Farzam, V., Talaqani, F., & Khail Kordi, R. (2016). The impact of monetary exchange rate shocks on employment in Iran's agriculture, industry, and services sectors. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Economic Research, 21(67), 83-112. DOI: 10.22054/ijer.2016.7237 [In Persian].
Flaschel, P., Gong, G., & Semmler, W.  (2003).  Monetary Policy, the Labor Market and Exchange Rate Regimes: A Study of the German Economy.  Bielefeld University: mimeo. DOI: 10.4324/9780203329580-13
Galí, J.  (2013).  Notes for a new guide to Keynes (I): Wages, aggregate demand, and employment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(5), 973-1003.
DOI: 10.1111/jeea.12032
Graves, S., Huckfeldt, C.  K., & Swanson, E.  T.  (2023).  The labor demand and labor supply channels of monetary policy (No.  w31770).  National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: 10.3386/w31770
Gulyas, A., Meier, M., & Ryzhenkov, M.  (2024).  Labor market effects of monetary policy across workers and firms.  European Economic Review, 166, 104756. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104756
Hua, P.  (2007).  Real exchange rate and manufacturing employment in China.  China Economic Review, 18(3), 335-353.
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2007.02.001
Kassouri, Y.  (2024).  The labor market impact of inflation uncertainty: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa.  International Review of Economics & Finance, 33(89A), 1514-1528. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.09.005
Kazerooni, A. R., Mohammadzadeh, P., Haghigat, J., & Taymouri Allahlou, S. (2019). The effect of monetary shocks on employment under exchange rate regimes in Iran: DSGE approach. Journal of Modern Economics and Trade, 14(2), 77-104 [In Persian].
Leskeri, M., Behnama, M., & Hasani, M. (2016). The effect of real exchange rate uncertainty on employment in Iran's services sector. Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 6(23), 115-130. DOR: 20.1001.1.22285954.1395.6.23.7.4 [In Persian].
Madeira, C., & Salazar, L.  (2023).  The impact of monetary policy on a labor market with heterogeneous workers: The case of Chile. Latin American Journal of Central Banking, 4(2), 100092. DOI: 10.1016/j.latcb.2023.100092
Mishkin, F.  S.  (1976).  Illiquidity, consumer durable expenditure, and monetary policy.  The American Economic Review, 66(4), 642-654.
Mishkin, F.  S. (1996). The channels of monetary transmission: lessons for monetary policy (No. w5464). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: 10.3386/w5464
Mohammadi Mojad, S., Mehrara, M., Barakati Dorbash, S., Negin Taji, Z., & Hashem Nezhad Aghdam, N. (2023). The asymmetric effect of monetary policies on unemployment in Iran. Journal of Islamic Economics and Banking, 12(44), 7-29 [In Persian].
Nezari, M., & Gouharian, F. (2002). Investigating the effect of monetary policy variables on employment by major economic sectors in Iran (1345-78). Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 37(1), 187-207. DOR: 20.1001.1.00398969.1381.37.1.6.1 [In Persian].
Rasouli, M., Abrishami, H., Mehrara, M., & Esfahaniyan, H. (2020). Predicting the impact of monetary and fiscal policies on the unemployment rate in Iran's economy. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 55(2), 321-345. DOI: 10.22059/jte.2020.77896 [In Persian].
Rostayi Shalamani, Kh., & Elmi, Z. M. (2019). Estimating the elasticity of labor demand in Iran's industrial workshops using a fractional panel probit approach. Commercial Research Journal, 23(91), 1-30. DOR: 20.1001.1.17350794.1398.23.91.1.7 [In Persian].
Samsami, H., & Ardi Zadeh, H. (2019). Exchange rate and labor demand in Iran's industrial workshops. Biannual Scientific Journal of Economic Studies and Policies, 6(1), 225-244 [In Persian].
Shakeri Bostan Abad, R., Jalili, Z., & Salehi Kamrudi, M. (2019). The regional impact of monetary policy on employment in Iran's industrial provinces: Structural factor-augmented vector autoregression (SFAVAR) approach. Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 9(35), 79-102. DOI: 10.30473/egdr.2019.43550.5013 [In Persian].
Singh, A., Suda, J., & Zervou, A.  (2022, May).  Monetary policy, labor market, and sectoral heterogeneity.  In AEA Papers and Proceedings (Vol.  112, pp.  491-495).  2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203: American Economic Association. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20221095
Taei, H. (2006). Labor supply function: An analysis based on microdata. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Economic Research, 8(29), 93-112 [In Persian].
Yokoyama, I., Higa, K., & Kawaguchi, D.  (2015).  The effect of exchange rate fluctuations on employment in a segmented labor market.  RIETI.
Yousafzai, S., & Naito, H.  (2024).  The Effect of Volatility of Unpredicted Exchange Rate Movement and Labor Market Rigidity (No.  2024-004).  Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
Zarvoki, Sh., Elmi, Z. M., & Yousefi Barforoushi, A. (2019). Analysis of the asymmetric effect of exchange rate on employment in Iran with emphasis on economic sectors. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 27(90), 277-312 [In Persian].
Zens, G., Böck, M., & Zörner, T.  O.  (2020).  The heterogeneous impact of monetary policy on the US labor market.  Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 42(119), 1-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103989