Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Economics, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Master's Student in Economic Systems Planning, Faculty of Economics, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

 Achieving sustainable economic growth and reducing dependence on fossil fuels are strategic priorities for Iran’s economy. Economic complexity—reflecting the technological sophistication and knowledge embedded in production—and renewable energy—supporting environmental protection and energy diversification—are both critical drivers of sustainable growth. This study examines the asymmetric and nonlinear effects of these two factors on Iran’s economic growth from 1995 to 2022 using the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model. The model distinguishes between short- and long-term impacts of positive and negative changes in each variable. Results indicate that positive shocks in renewable energy consumption and economic complexity significantly boost economic growth, while negative shocks have comparatively weaker adverse effects. Over the long term, increases in both variables contribute to growth, whereas decreases hinder it. Additionally, investment and labor positively influence economic growth, while carbon dioxide emissions exert a negative impact. The findings highlight the importance of advancing renewable energy and enhancing economic complexity as strategies to foster sustainable growth and reduce reliance on fossil fuel resources.
Introduction
Achieving sustainable economic growth and reducing dependence on fossil fuel resources are strategic objectives of Iran’s economy in the current context. Economic complexity, as an indicator of the level of technology and knowledge embedded in production, and renewable energies, as a tool to reduce environmental impacts and diversify the energy mix, both play vital roles in sustainable economic growth. This study analyzes the asymmetric and nonlinear effects of these two key variables on Iran’s economic growth over the period 1995 to 2022 using the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model. This model allows the separate examination of the positive and negative impacts of variables in the short and long run. The findings indicate that positive shocks in renewable energy consumption and economic complexity have significant and positive effects on economic growth, while negative shocks in these variables have smaller and adverse effects. In the long run, increases in renewable energy consumption and economic complexity enhance economic growth, whereas decreases reduce it. Furthermore, investment and labor have positive effects on economic growth, while carbon dioxide emissions have a negative impact. The results emphasize the importance of developing renewable energy and enhancing economic complexity in Iran. These two strategies not only strengthen economic growth but can also reduce environmental damage and the country’s reliance on fossil fuel resources.
Research Question
How do renewable energy consumption and economic complexity affect Iran's economic growth, and what is the pattern (asymmetric and nonlinear) of their impact?
Methods and Materials
This study utilizes annual time series data spanning from 1995 to 2022. The key variables include real gross domestic product (RGDP), renewable energy consumption (REC), economic complexity index (ECI), labor force (L), gross capital formation (RGCF), and carbon dioxide emissions (CO2). The econometric model is built on an augmented Cobb-Douglas production function and implemented using the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) approach. This method allows the decomposition of positive and negative shocks in explanatory variables and assesses their separate effects on economic growth. The asymmetric nature of the model provides more precise insights into how increases and decreases in renewable energy and complexity impact the economy. The findings are based on rigorous testing for stationarity, cointegration, and dynamic adjustment mechanisms.
Results and Discussion
The empirical findings confirm the asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and economic complexity on economic growth in Iran. In the short term, positive shocks in renewable energy consumption have a statistically significant and favorable impact on growth, while negative shocks show weaker and sometimes statistically insignificant effects. Similarly, positive changes in the economic complexity index lead to higher economic growth, whereas negative deviations exert milder negative influences. In the long run, both renewable energy and economic complexity maintain strong and positive relationships with economic growth. An increase in renewable energy consumption improves sustainability by promoting green technologies and reducing fossil fuel dependency. Enhanced economic complexity fosters innovation, diversification of exports, and technological advancement, all contributing to a more resilient economic structure. Other control variables such as gross capital formation and labor force also demonstrate expected positive effects, reinforcing their roles as traditional growth factors. In contrast, CO2 emissions exhibit a significant negative relationship with economic growth, highlighting the economic costs of environmental degradation. These results suggest that the direction and magnitude of shocks in energy and complexity matter significantly, supporting the adoption of targeted policies to stimulate positive developments in these areas while mitigating potential adverse shocks.       
Conclusion
This study highlights the critical roles of renewable energy consumption and economic complexity in shaping Iran’s economic growth trajectory. The use of the NARDL model enabled the identification of asymmetric responses to positive and negative shocks in both variables. The findings indicate that increases in renewable energy use and complexity drive economic growth, while their reductions have more limited adverse impacts. The results emphasize the importance of integrated economic and energy policies aimed at expanding renewable energy infrastructure and enhancing technological capabilities. Such strategies not only strengthen economic resilience and sustainability but also support environmental objectives by curbing carbon emissions and reducing fossil fuel reliance. Promoting innovation, investing in renewable sectors, and fostering complex economic activities can thus serve as complementary pillars for sustainable development in Iran.
Acknowledgments
Include your acknowledgments here, if any.

Keywords

ایازی، شلیر، عطرکار روشن، صدیقه و صفرزاد، اسماعیل.( 1402)، تأثیر مصرف انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر و تجدید ناپذیر بر رشد اقتصادی و محیط زیست( مقایسه کشورهای نفتی و غیرنفتی). پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران، دوره 12، شماره 48، 31-56.
بهرامی، جاوید و حسنپور کارسالاری، یوسف. (1396). پیچیدگی صادرات غیرنفتی ایران و عوامل تعیین کننده آن در کشورهای درحال توسعه. پژوهشنامه بازرگانی،10 (36)، 14-1.
تهامی پور، مرتضی، عابدی، سمانه، کریمی بابا احمدی، رضا و ابراهیمی زاده، مرتضی. (1395). بررسی تأثیر انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر بر سرانه رشد اقتصادی واقعی ایران، پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران، 5(19)، 53-77.
جواهری، بختیار، قادری، سامان، قماشی، نیکو و امانی، رامین. (1403). بررسی تأثیر پیچیدگی اقتصادی و ردپای اکولوژیکی بر رشد اقتصادی کشورهای اوپک. پژوهش‌های اقتصادی (رشد و توسعه پایدار)، سال 24، شماره اول، 27-56.
رفعت، منیره و احمدی، سعیده. (1401). بررسی اثر شاخص پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر سطح تولید ناخالص داخلی ایران. پژوهش‌های اقتصادی، سال بیست و سوم، شماره سوم، 107-132.
سعیدی، رضا، نصابیان، شهریار، مقدسی، رضا و دامنکشیده، مرجان. (1401). پیچیدگی اقتصادی و مصرف انرژی فسیلی: تحلیل تجربی بر پایه داده‌های استان‌های ایران. پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، (22)85، 188-155.
 قائد، ابراهیم، دهقانی، علی و فتاحی، محمد. (1398). بررسی تأثیر انواع انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر بر رشد اقتصادی ایران. پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 9 (35)،137-148.
کارگر ده بیدی، نوید، قربانیان، عفت و طراز کار، محمد حسن. (1399). تأثیر مصرف انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر و تجدید ناپذیر بر رشد اقتصادی کشورهای اسلامی D-8. اقتصاد و تجارت نوین، 15 (2)،67-90.
کریمی، محمدشریف، سهیلی، کیومرث و برزگری، شیما. (1399). رابطه بین مصرف انرژی تجدید پذیر و رشد اقتصادی در ایران. علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 22(6)، 31-47.
مستولی زاده، سید محمد و سلیمی لیلا. (1399). رابطه شاخص پیچیدگی اقتصادی و شاخص توسعه کشورهای توسعه یافته و در حال توسعه. تحقیقات اقتصادی، دوره 55، شماره 4،853-886.
Al-Darraji, Harith Hadi Mohammed, Bakir, Amir, (2020), The Impact of Renewable Energy Investment on Economic Growth; Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJJSS), Vol.9, No.2, pp:234-248;  https://doi.org/10.25255/jss.2020.9.2.234.248.
Ayazi Shiler, S., Atrakar Roshan, S., & Safarzadeh, E. (2023). The impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth and the environment: A comparison between oil and non-oil countries. Iranian Journal of Energy Economics, 12(48), 31-56. [In Persian].
Azlina, A. A., Law, S. H., & Nik Mustapha, N. H. (2014). Dynamic linkages among transport energy consumption, income and CO2 emission in Malaysia. Energy Policy, 73, 598-606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.046
Bahrami, J., & Hassanpour Karsalari, Y. (2017). The complexity of Iran’s non-oil exports and its determinants in developing countries. Commercial Research Journal, 10(36), 1-14 .[In Persian]
Baz, K., Cheng, J., Xu, D., Abbas, K., Ali, I., Ali, H., & Fang, C. (2021). Asymmetric impact of fossil fuel and renewable energy consumption on economic growth: A nonlinear technique. Energy, 226, 120357.  https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120357
Bhuiyan MA, Zhang Q, Khare V, Mikhaylov A, Pinter G and Huang X ,(2022), Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus—A Systematic Literature Review. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:878394. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.878394.
Bustos, S., Gomez, C., Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2012). The Dynamics of Nestedness Predicts the Evolution of Industrial Ecosystems. PLOS ONE, 7(11), e49393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049393 .
Berndt, E. R., & Wood, D. O. (1975). Technology, prices, and the derived demand for energy. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 57(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/1923910.
Chávez, J. C., Mosqueda, M. T., & Gómez-Zaldívar, M. (2017). Economic Complexity and Regional Growth Performance: Evidence from the Mexican Economy. The Review of Regional Studies, 47(2), 201-219. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rre:publsh:v47:y:2017:i:2:p:201-219
Cristelli, M., Tacchella, A., & Pietronero, L. (2015). The Heterogeneous Dynamics of Economic Complexity. PLOS ONE, 10(2), https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0117174
De Cunzo, F., Petri, A., Zaccaria, A., & Sbardella, A. (2022). The trickle-down from environmental innovation to productive complexity. Scientific report,vol12 http://www.nature.com/scientificreports.
Dirma, V., Neverauskiene,˙ L.O., Tvaronaviˇciene, M., ˙ Danileviˇciene, I., Tamoši ˙ unien ¯ e, R. ˙ The Impact of Renewable Energy Development on Economic Growth. Energies 2024, 17, 6328. https:// doi.org/10.3390/en17246328.
Dogan Eyup, Buket Altinoz, Mara Madaleno, Dilvin Taskin (2020). The impact of renewable energy consumption to economic growth: A replication and extension of Inglesi-Lotz (2016). Energy Economics. 0), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104866. 273, 111146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111146 .
Fan, W., Hao, Y. (2020). An empirical research on the relationship amongst renewable energy consumption, economic growth and foreign direct investment in China. Renew. Energy 146(C),598-609.
Fan, W., & Hao, Y. (2020). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from China. Renewable Energy.
Fang, Y. (2011). Economic welfare impacts from renewable energy consumption: The China experience. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), 5120-5128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.
Gao, J., & Zhou, T. (2018). Quantifying China’s regional economic complexity. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 492, 1591-1603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.084.
Gha’ed Ebrahim, Dehghani, A., & Fattahi, M. (2019). Examining the impact of different types of renewable energy on Iran’s economic growth. Economic Growth and Development Research, 9(35), 137-148. [In Persian]
Gozgor, G. (2018). A new approach to the renewable energy-growth nexus: evidence from the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(17), 16590-16600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1858-9
Hartmann, D., Guevara, M. R., Jara-Figueroa, C., Aristarán, M., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2017). Linking Economic Complexity, Institutions, and Income Inequality. World Development, 93, 75-93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020
Hartmann, D., Jara-Figueroa, C., Guevara, M., Simoes, A., & Hidalgo, C. e. A. (2017). The structural constraints of income inequality in Latin America. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:1701.03770
Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C.A. (2010). Country Diversification, Product Ubiquity, and Economic Divergence.
Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C.A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jemenez, J., Simoes, A., Yidirim,. (2011). The Atlas of Economic Complexity. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C.A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., Yildirim, M.A. (2014). The Atlas of 1005Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths To Prosperit.
Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4
Hidalgo, C. A., Hausmann, R., & Dasgupta, P. S. (2009). The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10570-10575. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40483593
Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A. L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations. Science, 317(5837), 482-487. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20037448
Javaheri Bakhtiari, S., Ghaderi, S., Ghamashi Niko, & Amani, R. (2024). The impact of economic complexity and ecological footprint on economic growth in OPEC countries. Economic Research (Growth and Sustainable Development), 24(1), 27-56. [In Persian]
Kargar Dehbidi, N., Ghorbanian, E., & Tarazkar, M. H. (2020). The impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth in D-8 Islamic countries. Modern Economics and Trade, 15(2), 67-90. [In Persian]
 Karimi, M. S., Soheili, K., & Barzegari, S. (2020). The relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic growth in Iran. Environmental Science and Technology, 22(6), 31-47. [In Persian]
Kemeny, T., & Storper, M. (2015). Is Specialization Good for Regional Economic Development? Regional Studies, 49(6), 1003-1018.  https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:regstd:v:49:y:2015:i:6:p:1003-1018
Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). On the Relationship Between Energy and GNP. The Journal of Energy and Development, 3(2), 401-403. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24806805
Lapatinas, A. (2019). The effect of the Internet on economic sophistication: An empirical analysis. Economics Letters, 174(C), 35-38. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:174:y:2019:i:c:p:35-38
Laverde-Rojas, H., Guevara-Fletcher, D. A., & Camacho-Murillo, A. (2021). Economic growth, economic complexity, and carbon dioxide emissions: The case of Colombia. Heliyon, 7(6), e07188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07188
Lo Turco, A., & Maggioni, D. (2022). The knowledge and skill content of production complexity. Research Policy, 51(8), 104059.  https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104059
Lybbert, T., & Xu, M. (2022). Innovation‐adjusted economic complexity and growth: Do patent flows reveal enhanced economic capabilities? Review of Development Economics, 26(1), 442-483.  https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:26:y:2022:i:1:p:442-483
Mighri, Z., & AlSaggaf, M. I.(2022). Asymmetric impacts of renewable energy consumption and economic complexity on economic growth in Saudi Arabia: Evidence from the NARDL model [Preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1594202/v1
Mostoulizadeh, S. M., & Salimi, L. (2020). The relationship between the economic complexity index and the development index in developed and developing countries. Economic Research, 55(4), 853-886. [In Persian]
Ocal, O., & Aslan, A. (2013). Renewable energy consumption–economic growth nexus in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 494-499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.036
 Pao, H.-T., & Fu, H.-C. (2013). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and economic growth in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 381-392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.004
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2678547
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. (1998). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strom (Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Econometric Society Monographs (pp. 371-413). Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres
Poncet, S., de Waldemar, F.S. (2013). Economic complexity and growth.
 Raf’at, M., & Ahmadi, S. (2022). The effect of the economic complexity index on Iran’s GDP level. Economic Research, 23(3), 107-132. [In Persian]
Saeidi, R., Nasabian, S., Moghaddasi, R., & Damankeshideh, M. (2022). Economic complexity and fossil energy consumption: An empirical analysis based on data from Iranian provinces.Economic Research Journal, 22(85), 155–188. [In Persian]
Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework. In R. C. Sickles & W. C. Horrace (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications (pp. 281-314). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9.
Strielkowski, W, Civín, L, Tarkhanova, E, Tvaronaviˇciene, M, ˙ Petrenko, Y. Renewable Energy in the Sustainable Development of Electrical Power Sector: A Review. Energies 2021, 14, 8240. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/en14248240.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513.
 Tahami Pour, M., Abedi, S., Karimi Baba Ahmadi, R., & Ebrahimi Zadeh, M. (2016). Investigating the impact of renewable energies on Iran’s real per capita economic growth. Iranian Journal of Energy Economics, 5(19), 53-77. [In Persian]
Tiwari, A. K. (2014). The asymmetric Granger-causality analysis between energy consumption and income in the United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 36, 362-369.  https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.066 .
Udeogu, E., Roy-Mukherjee, S., & Amakom, U. (2021). Does Increasing Product Complexity and Diversity Cause Economic Growth in the Long-Run? A GMM Panel VAR Evidence. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211032918. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032918 .
Yildirim, E., Saraç, Ş., & Aslan, A. (2012). Energy consumption and economic growth in the USA: Evidence from renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(9), 6770-6774. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.004 .
Zhu, S., & Li, R. (2020). Economic complexity and economic growth: Evidence from cross-country panel data. Applied Economics.