Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Master's Graduate, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

 This study employs the Diebold-Yilmaz spillover index within the framework of a time-varying parameter vector autoregressive model (TVP-VAR) to analyze the dynamic connectedness between exchange rates and the Iranian stock market amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilizing daily data spanning from October 2014 to October 2023, we examine the volatility spillovers between the US dollar and the stock indices of eight industries, including "chemicals", "basic metals", "petroleum products", "extraction of metal ores", "agriculture", "sugar", "cement", and "ceramics". Our findings reveal that systemic risk, represented by total connectedness within the network, averaged approximately 50% before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, following the emergence of the pandemic, network connections intensified significantly, surpassing 70% at times. The US dollar variable exhibits the highest idiosyncratic risk (75.62%), while the indices of basic metal industries (34.52%) and metal ores (34.59%) demonstrate the lowest idiosyncratic risk. Analysis of the network dynamics indicates that volatility originating from export-oriented commodity industries, particularly basic metals, predominantly influences the US dollar variable, acting as a net transmitter of volatilities to smaller industries, notably ceramics. Moreover, the basic metal industry emerges as the primary transmitter of volatilities within the network, with the agricultural and ceramic industries identified as significant recipients of shocks.
Introduction
Financial asset markets are subject to volatility at one point or another due to domestic or global political, economic, and social events. It is clear that major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic can significantly alter the relationships between markets. In such circumstances, studying the dynamics of correlations and information flows between different assets and markets becomes important and provides investors, policymakers, and portfolio managers with deeper insights. In these circumstances, the two foreign exchange and stock markets react strongly to events and affect the economy. Therefore, this article aims to answer the following questions:
How do the dynamics of dollar rate volatility affect the returns of various stock market industry indices, and how do the dynamics of stock market industry index return volatility affect the dollar? How does the connectedness between the dollar rate and stock market industry indices change in the period before and after the COVID-19 outbreak?
Method
The present study uses a TVP-VAR approach. The method overcomes certain shortcomings of the connectedness criteria of standard VAR models, such as “the arbitrarily chosen rolling window size”, “missing observations”, and “parameters sensitive to outliers”.
Results
An examination of the dynamic spillovers of return volatilities between the exchange rate and the stock index of 8 listed industries, including "chemicals", "basic metals", "petroleum products", "metal ore", "agriculture", "sugar", "cement" and "ceramics" during the period from October 2014 to October 2023, shows:

The total connectedness index is around 53 percent, which indicates a relatively high systemic risk in the network.
The dynamics of the total directional net connectedness index indicate that each variable has been a net transmitter of shocks in some periods and a net receiver of shocks in others. However, in the overall period review, the basic metals, cement, chemical, metal ore, and petroleum products industries act as transmitters of shocks, and the agricultural, ceramic and sugar industries and dollar act as receivers of shocks in the network.
The dynamics of the total connectedness index during the period of study indicate a significant increase in this index after the COVID-19 pandemic, with the highest figure for the index also being experienced after the outbreak of this disease.
In the network, the basic metals industry is identified as the strongest transmitter of shocks, and the agricultural and ceramic industries are also the most important shock receivers. In addition, on average, the dollar is affected by the shocks of export-oriented commodity industries, especially basic metals, and has been a net transmitter of shocks to small-stock industries, especially ceramics.

Table 1. Averaged dynamic connectedness




 


USD


chemicals


petroleum
products


basic metals


metal ore


agriculture


sugar


cement


ceramics


FROM


 




USD


75.62


4.38


3.40


4.50


3.31


1.80


1.34


4.03


1.61


24.38




chemicals


3.89


36.35


10.54


15.82


15.01


4.02


3.02


7.39


3.94


63.65




petroleum
products


1.89


11.93


44.49


15.07


11.01


2.20


3.23


5.94


4.24


55.51




basic metals


2.85


14.06


12.19


34.52


19.71


3.01


3.23


6.90


3.52


65.48




metal ore


2.91


14.12


10.06


22.63


34.59


3.23


3.37


6.06


3.03


65.41




agriculture


2.62


6.01


4.76


4.30


5.17


56.28


6.80


9.09


4.98


43.72




sugar


1.92


6.44


4.55


4.68


4.08


6.11


51.87


11.49


8.86


48.13




cement


2.13


6.61


6.55


8.94


6.31


6.83


8.70


42.19


11.73


57.81




ceramics


2.66


5.17


4.55


5.64


4.75


4.98


9.36


15.58


47.32


52.68




TO


20.87


68.73


56.61


81.58


69.35


32.17


39.06


66.48


41.92


476.77




NET


-3.51


5.08


1.10


16.10


3.94


-11.55


-9.07


8.67


-10.76


52.97




NPDC


3


5


5


8


7


0


2


5


1


 


 




 
 
 
Figure 1. Dynamics of Total Connectedness Index
 
 
Figure 1. Net pairwise directional connectedness
 
Conclusion
This research provides valuable insights for policymakers in formulating growth-stimulating policies and designing preventive measures against systemic risk. Additionally, it offers investors an efficient tool for constructing optimal investment portfolios tailored to systemic risk considerations.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the esteemed editorial board for their efforts in improving this article.

Keywords

مهاجری، پریسا و طالبلو، رضا. (1401). بررسی پویایی‌های سرریز تلاطمات بین بازده بخش‌ها با رویکرد اتصالات خودرگرسیون برداری با پارامترهای متغیر در طول زمان(TVP-VAR)؛ شواهدی از بازار سهام ایران. تحقیقات اقتصادی، 57(2)، 321-356.
Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., & Gabauer, D. (2020). Refined measures of dynamic connectedness based on time-varying parameter vector autoregressions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(4), 84.
Antonakakis, N., Cunado, J., Filis, G., Gabauer, D., & de Gracia, F. P. (2023). Dynamic connectedness among the implied volatilities of oil prices and financial assets: New evidence of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Review of Economics & Finance, 83, 114-123.
Aydemir, O., & Demirhan, E. (2009). The relationship between stock prices and exchange rates: Evidence from Turkey. International research journal of finance and economics, 23(2), 207-215.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Saha, S. (2016). Do exchange rate changes have symmetric or asymmetric effects on stock prices?. Global Finance Journal, 31, 57-72.
BenSaïda, A., & Litimi, H. (2021). Financial contagion across G10 stock markets: a study during major crises. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(3), 4798-4821.
Chatziantoniou, I. and Gabauer, D. (2021). EMU risk-synchronisation and financial fragility through the prism of dynamic connectedness. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 79:1–14.
Chatziantoniou, I., Gabauer, D., & Marfatia, H. A. (2022). Dynamic connectedness and spillovers across sectors: Evidence from the Indian stock market. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 283-300.
Chiang, T. C., Jeon, B. N., & Li, H. (2007). Dynamic correlation analysis of financial contagion: Evidence from Asian markets. Journal of International Money and finance, 26(7), 1206-1228.
Civcir, İ., & Akkoç, U. (2021). Dynamic volatility linkages and hedging between commodities and sectoral stock returns in Turkey: Evidence from SVAR‐cDCC‐GARCH model. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 1978-1992.
De Mello, L., & Moccero, D. (2009). Monetary Policy and Inflation Expectations in Latin America: Long‐Run Effects and Volatility Spillovers. Journal of money, Credit and Banking, 41(8), 1671-1690.
Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2009). Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. The Economic Journal, 119(534), 158-171.
Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2012). Better to Give than to Receive: Predictive Directional Measurementof Volatility Spillovers Forthcoming. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(1), 57-66.
Diebold, F.X., & Yilmaz, K. (2014). On the Network Topology of Variance Decompositions: Measuring the Connectedness of Financial Firms. Journal of Econometrics, 182(1), 119–134.
Enilov, M., Fazio, G., & Ghoshray, A. (2023). Global connectivity between commodity prices and national stock markets: A time‐varying MIDAS analysis. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(3), 2607-2619.
Gabauer, D. (2021). Dynamic measures of asymmetric & pairwise spillovers within an optimal currency area: Evidence from the ERM I system. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, page 100680.
Kanas, A. (2000). Volatility spillovers between stock returns and exchange rate changes: International evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27(3‐4), 447-467.
Koop, G., Pesaran, M. H., & Potter, S. M. (1996). Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of econometrics, 74(1), 119-147.
Kumar, S., Kumar, A., & Singh, G. (2023). Causal relationship among international crude oil, gold, exchange rate, and stock market: Fresh evidence from NARDL testing approach. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(1), 47-57.
Li, F., & Zhu, H. (2014). Testing for financial contagion based on a nonparametric measure of the cross‐market correlation. Review of Financial Economics, 23(3), 141-147.
Mohajeri, P. and Taleblou, R. (2022). Investigating the Dynamics of Volatility Spillovers across Sectors’ Returns Utilizing a Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregressive Connectedness Approach; Evidence from Iranian Stock Market. Journal of Economic Research, 57(2), 321-356. [In Persian]
Moser, T. (2003). What is international financial contagion?. International Finance, 6(2), 157-178.
Nusair, S. A., & Olson, D. (2022). Dynamic relationship between exchange rates and stock prices for the G7 countries: A nonlinear ARDL approach. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 78, 101541.‏
Patra, S., & Panda, P. (2021). Spillovers and financial integration in emerging markets: Analysis of BRICS economies within a VAR‐BEKK framework. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(1), 493-514.
Pesaran, H. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics letters, 58(1), 17-29.
Sharma, N. (2015). Causal relation between stock return and exchange rate: Evidence from India. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 15(11), 27-32.
Taleblou, R. and Mohajeri, P. (2023). Modeling the Daily Volatility of Oil, Gold, Dollar, Bitcoin and Iranian Stock Markets: An Empirical Application of a Nonlinear Space State Model. Iranian Economic Review, 27(3), 1033-1063.
Tiwari, A. K., Adewuyi, A. O., Awodumi, O. B., & Roubaud, D. (2022). Relationship between stock returns and inflation: New evidence from the US using wavelet and causality methods. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(4), 4515-4540.
Tiwari, A. K., Nasreen, S., Ullah, S., & Shahbaz, M. (2021). Analysing spillover between returns and volatility series of oil across major stock markets. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 2458-2490.
Wong, H. T. (2019). Volatility spillovers between real exchange rate returns and real stock price returns in Malaysia. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24(1), 131-149.
Worthington, A., & Higgs, H. (2004). Transmission of equity returns and volatility in Asian developed and emerging markets: a multivariate GARCH analysis. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 9(1), 71-80.
Zhang, H., Chen, J., & Shao, L. (2021). Dynamic spillovers between energy and stock markets and their implications in the context of COVID-19. International Review of Financial Analysis, 77, 101828.