Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor in Energy Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Student in Econometrics, Department of Theoretical Economics, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Master of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.

Abstract

 This study investigates the impact of government subsidies on economic well-being in Iran, using both symmetric and asymmetric approaches. Economic well-being is first quantified using a composite index based on four components: consumption flow, wealth stocks, income distribution, and economic security. The study then applies an ARDL & NARDL­­ model to assess the linear and non-linear effects of subsidies on economic well-being over the period from 1973 to 2022.
The findings reveal a significant decline in economic well-being from 1975 until the end of the Iran-Iraq War, followed by an upward trend until the Sixth Development Plan. The average index value increased from 20.9 in the First Plan to 60.3 in the Fifth Plan, but then fell to an average of 8 in the Sixth Plan. The share of subsidies in total government expenditure increased from 1973 to the end of the war and during the First to Fourth Development Plans, but decreased thereafter, particularly in the Sixth Plan.Long-term estimates indicate that both increases and decreases in subsidy expenditures directly impact economic well-being. However, the effect of subsidy reductions on economic well-being is more significant than that of increases, suggesting the presence of an asymmetric impact. Moreover, the analysis of the optimal subsidy level reveals that subsidies enhance economic well-being up to a threshold of 8.8% of government expenditure; beyond this point, increasing subsidies has a detrimental effect on economic well-being.Additionally, the study highlights a marked decline in economic well-being during the periods 1976-1989 and 2017-2022, with the post-JCPOA period witnessing a more substantial decline due to the intensification of sanctions.
Introduction
The issue of well-being and its improvement is one of the central concerns of societies, with politicians often claiming to prioritize the creation of well-being for their citizens. Economic well-being is influenced by numerous factors, including population size, economic complexity, globalization, exchange rate fluctuations, economic growth, unemployment, inflation, sanctions, production volatility, government size, and government spending. Empirical studies by Sowa and Edpri (2007), Nan and Zhang (2018), Sunita and Mahendra (2022), and Wu and Liu (2023) highlight the significant impact of government expenditures, such as subsidies, on both economic and social well-being. These studies establish a notable relationship between government spending and economic well-being.
Among the key factors influencing economic well-being, government expenditures, and specifically subsidized spending, play a critical role. These expenditures can directly or indirectly affect economic well-being. Consequently, analyzing changes in government expenditures, particularly subsidies, is crucial for policies aimed at promoting economic growth and improving well-being. Given the close relationship between these two variables, determining the optimal level and composition of government spending can have substantial implications for macroeconomic policy.
It is important to note that the relationship between government expenditures, subsidies, and the factors influencing them is not necessarily symmetrical. Rather, it may exhibit asymmetry. This study seeks to first calculate economic well-being over the past fifty years using a composite index. Second, it aims to analyze both the symmetric and asymmetric effects of subsidy expenditures on well-being in Iran from 1973 to 2022 through three separate models. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model, incorporating both linear and nonlinear approaches, is employed for model estimation. Additionally, the study explores how variations in subsidy spending impact economic well-being, particularly by distinguishing between the effects of subsidy increases and decreases.
This research is innovative in several ways. First, it uses a comprehensive economic well-being index, as opposed to the Amartya Sen social welfare index, over a more extensive time period (1973-2022), which covers significant political and economic events, including Iran’s development plans, the Iran-Iraq War, the revolution, and international sanctions. Second, while previous studies have not specifically examined the asymmetry in subsidy effects on well-being, this research distinguishes between the impacts of subsidy increases and decreases. Third, the study aims to determine the optimal level of government subsidy expenditures for maximizing economic well-being.
Method
For this study, the IEWB (Index of Economic Well-Being) is used as a comprehensive measure to analyze the economic well-being of Iran over the period from 1973 to 2022. The IEWB index incorporates four key dimensions: effective per capita consumption flow, wealth stocks, distribution of individual income, and economic security. Each of these dimensions is weighted based on its relative importance.The general formula for the IEWB index is as follows:
IEWB=CF+WS+ID+E
Where:

CF = Effective per capita consumption flow
WS = Wealth stocks
ID = Distribution of individual income
E = Economic security

To calculate the economic well-being index, each of these components is assigned a coefficient based on their relative importance. Following the methodology of Osberg and Sharp (2009) and prior studies, the coefficients are as follows:

4 for consumption (CF),
for wealth stocks (WS),
25 for income distribution (ID),
25 for economic security (E).

Given that the dimensions are measured using different units, each component is first normalized before calculating the weighted average. The normalization process ensures comparability across the dimensions, and it is carried out using the following formula:
 
Here,  ​ represents the normalized value, while  ​ and  ​ denote the minimum and maximum values of the respective dimension. Using this approach, the economic well-being index was calculated for the period from 1973 to 2022.
As mentioned in the introduction, the main goal of this research is to analyze and investigate the symmetrical and asymmetrical effects of subsidies on economic well-being in Iran. The research model focuses on examining how subsidies affect economic well-being, specifically distinguishing between the effects of subsidy increases and decreases. The asymmetric model specification follows Shin et al. (2014), who examined how coefficients of factors affecting a dependent variable may differ during periods of economic well-being versus recession. Building on Pesaran et al.'s (2001) work, they developed the non-linear autoregressive with distributed lag (NARDL) model. This study applies their pattern in two formats (symmetrical and asymmetric) to analyze our research variables. Additionally, a third model is specified to calculate the optimal ratio of subsidy to total government expenditure.
Results and Discussion
The present research investigates and analyzes the effect of subsidies on Iran's economic well-being based on symmetrical and asymmetrical approaches. Additionally, in a separate model (the third model), the optimal ratio of subsidy to government expenditure was calculated. For this purpose, economic well-being was first calculated using the composite index of well-being based on four dimensions for the period 1973-2022, and the coefficients were estimated using three patterns with ARDL & NARDL approaches.
The results of calculating the well-being index and describing the data show that the well-being index increased consistently from the first plan to the fifth plan, rising from 20.9 in the first plan sub-period to 60.3 in the fifth plan sub-period. Furthermore, after the third plan sub-period, the level of well-being remained higher than the average of the studied periods.
The long-run estimation results indicate that subsidies have a direct and asymmetric effect on economic well-being. The direct effect of subsidy decreases on economic well-being is greater than the effect of subsidy increases. Additionally, subsidies demonstrate an inverted U-shaped effect on economic well-being. The optimal ratio of subsidy to total government expenditure for maximizing economic well-being is 8.8%. When subsidies are
below this 8.8% threshold, increases in subsidies are associated with improved economic well-being; above this threshold, additional subsidies lead to decreased economic well-being.
Real GDP per capita and economic growth show positive effects on economic well-being, while inflation demonstrates a negative effect. Based on these findings, it is recommended that policymakers focus on policies to increase subsidy expenditures. However, given the significant negative impact of inflation on economic well-being, policymakers should carefully consider inflation when increasing subsidized expenditures. Non-inflationary methods should be prioritized when financing subsidized expenditures wherever possible.

Keywords

اعمی بنده قرایی، حسن. خدادادکاشی، فرهاد. و موسوی جهرمی، یگانه. (1398). ارزیابی تأثیر‌ پرداخت یارانه برکاهش فقر در ایران. پژوهش­ها و سیاست­های اقتصادی، 27(89 )، 7-27.
تشکینی، احمد. شفیعی، افسانه و عریانی، بهاره (1387). مشخصه‌های نظام کنونی پرداخت یارانه حامل‌های انرژی در ایران و الزامات. معاونت برنامه ریزی و بررسی‌های اقتصادی، دفتر مطالعات اقتصادی.
جعفری صمیمی، احمد. اثنی عشری، ابوالقاسم. و محنت فر، یوسف. (1384). بررسی اثرات اقتصادی یارانه بنزین بر رشد اقتصادی در ایران: یک تحلیل تجربی (1381-1350). پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، 5(4 (پیاپی 19))، 11-44.
رحیمی، عباس و کلانتری، عباس (1371). تحلیل و بررسی اقتصادی سوبسید، مؤسسه مطالعات و پژوهش‌های بازرگانی، چاپ دوم، تهران.
زروکی، شهریار و مقدسی سدهی، اکرم (1400). نقش رونق و رکود اقتصادی در مصرف انرژی بخش‌ها با تاکید بر انرژی برق و غیربرق. مدلسازی اقتصادی، 15(53)، 124-97. 
عریانی، بهار (۱۳۹۰). بررسی اثربخشی یارانه در بهبود توزیع درآمد در برنامه‌های توسعه ایران. مجله اقتصادی، ماهنامه بررسی مسائل و سیاست‌های اقتصادی، 11(12), 31-52.‎
علیزاده، مهدی (1389). درآمدی بر تاثیرات اقتصادی هدفمند کردن یارانه‌ها (بانگرشی به طره هدفمند‌کردن یارانه‌ها). اقتصاد شهر، 6(3)، 131-117.
فرهنگ، منوچهر (1363). فرهنگ علوم اقتصادی انگلیسی به فارسی، انتشارات آزاده، چاپ چهارم.
کرمی، فردین (1393). بررسی تأثیر‌ هدفمندی یارانه‌ها بررشد تولید ناخالص داخلی در ایران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه بوعلی سینا.
محمدی، تیمور. پژویان، جمشید. و عباس زاده، شیما (1390). تأثیر‌ حذف یارانه انرژی بر تولید ناخالص ملی در ایران. اقتصاد کاربردی، 2(4)، 1-24.
معین، محمد (1388). فرهنگ فارسی معین. انتشارات اشجع.
نوراللهی، عفت. قاسمی، مریم و نوغانی، محسن (۱۳۹۶). اثربخشی هدفمندی یارانه‌ها برکیفیت زندگی روستاییان مورد: روستاهای بخش احمدآباد شهرستان مشهد . اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی، ۶(۲۱)، ۵۷-۸۰.
Aama Bandeh Gharaei , H., Khodadadkashi, F., & Mousavi Jahromi, Y. (2018). Evaluating the Impact of Subsidy Payments on Poverty Reduction in Iran. Economic Research and Policies, 27(89), 7-27.  [In Persian] 
Alizadeh, M. (2014). Income on the Economic Effects of Targeting Subsidies (With an Attitude Towards the Plan of Targeting Subsidies). City Economy, 6(3), 117-131. [In Persian]
Armanmehr, M., & Farahmandmanesh, A. (2018). Investigating the Effect of Inflation on Income Inequality of Urban Households in Iran using the Atkinson Approach. Journal of Economics and Regional Development25(16), 127-152. Doi: 10.22067/erd. v25i15.62836. [In Persian]
Bakhtiari, S., & Samad Poor, N. (2011). Estimating the Welfare Cost of Inflation in the Iranian Economy. The Journal of Economic Studies and Policies, 0(19), 3-16. [In Persian]
Boughanmi, H., & Khan, M. A. (2019). Welfare and Distributional Effects of the Energy Subsidy Reform in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: The Case of Sultanate of Oman. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy9(1), 228-236.
Bowen, S., & Yunhui, Z. (2020). Government Subsidy in the U.S. Mortgage Market: A Structural Analysis with Bunching. Social Science Research Network, Doi: 10.2139/SSRN.3679347
Dourandish, A., & Nikoukar, A. (2018). Investigating the Impact of Cash Subsidies on the Welfare of Rural Families in Khorasan Razavi Province. Journal of Geography and Regional Development16(1), 89-116. Doi: 10.22067/geography. v16i1.63889. [In Persian]
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 111773, 89–125.
Erayani, B. (2011). Investigating the Effectiveness of Subsidies in Improving Income Distribution in Iranian Development Programs. Economic Journal, Monthly Review of Economic Issues and Policies, 11(12), 31-52. [In Persian]
Farhang, M. (1984). Dictionary of Economic Sciences English to Persian, Azadeh Publications, 4th edition. [In Persian]
Ghasemi, M., Abdullahi, S., & Khakshoraman Abad, H. (2014). Investigating the Effects of the First Stage of the Subsidy Targeting Plan on Rural Households (Case Study: Binalud City). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 3(6), 117-131. [In Persian]
Hakim, R. A., Ismail, R., & Razak, N. A. A. (2016). Fuel Subsidy Reform in Malaysia: An Assessment on the Direct Welfare Impact on Consumers. Global Business Management Review (GBMR)8(1), 26-36.‏ [In Persian]
Horry, H., Jalae, S. A., & Lashkari, M. (2020). Investigation the Effect of Business Cycle on the Index of Economic Well-being in Iran. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 25(82), 149-172.
Hosan, S., Sen, K. K., Rahman, M. M., Karmaker, S. C., Chapman, A. J., & Saha, B. B. (2023). Evaluating the Mediating Role of Energy Subsidies on Social Well-being and Energy Poverty Alleviation in Bangladesh. Energy Research & Social Science100, 103088.
Hu, R., Yang, Y., & Zheng, Z. (2023). Effects of Subsidies on Growth and Welfare in a Quality‐Ladder Model with Elastic Labor. Journal of Public Economic Theory25(5), 1096-1137.
Jafari Samimi, A., Asni Ashari , A., & Mehnatfar, Y. (2006). Investigating the Economic Effects of Gasoline Subsidies on Economic Growth in Iran: An Empirical Analysis (1978-2002). Journal of Economic Research, 5(4 (19th issue), 11-44. [In Persian]
Karami, F. (2014). Studying the Impact of Subsidies Targeting on GDP Growth in Iran. Master's Thesis. Bu-Ali Sina University. [In Persian]
Mohammadi, T., Pejouyan, J., & Abbaszadeh, Sh. (2011). The Effect of Eliminating Energy Subsidies on Gross National Product in Iran. Applied Economics, 2(4), 1-24. [In Persian]
Moein, M. (2009). Moein Persian Dictionary. Ashja Publications. [In Persian]
Nan, X., Zhang, M. (2018). Do Government Subsidies Reinforce the Cost Stickiness of Strategic Emerging Industries. Journal of Finance and Economics, 44(08):114-127. Doi: 10.16538/J.CNKI.JFE.2018.08.009.
Noorollahi, E., Ghasemi, M., & Noghani, M. (2017). The Effectiveness of Targeted Subsidies on the Quality of Life of Villagers. Case: Villages in Ahmadabad District of Mashhad City. Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 6(21), 57-80. [In Persian]
Oduyemi, G. O., Lawal, N. A., Onayemi, O. O., Philips, A. S., & Kasali, S. O. (2021). Assessment of the Impact of Petroleum Subsidy Removal ON Welfare in Nigeria. College of Management Sciences, Bells University of Technology, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria, 181.‏
Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2009). Measuring Economic Security in Insecure Times: New Perspectives, New Events and the Index of Economic Well-being. Presented at Canadian Economics Association Annual Conference.
Pressman, S., & Summerfield, G. (2008). The Economic Contributions of Amartya Sen. In Leading Contemporary Economists (pp. 84-116). Routledge.
Zhang, R., Ma, W., & Liu, J. (2021). Impact of Government Subsidy on Agricultural Production and Pollution: A Game-Theoretic Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285:124806-. Doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.124806
Rahimi, A., & Kalantari, A. (1992). Economic Analysis and Study of Subsidy, Institute of Business Studies and Research, Second Edition, Tehran. [In Persian]
Sadeghi, M., Akbari, N., & Amiri, H. (2016). The Impact of Targeted Subsides of Basic Goods on the Household Welfare: A Case Study of the City of Isfahan. The Journal of Economic Policy, 8(16), 41-64. [In Persian]
Safavi Gerdini, M., Raeispour Rajabali, A., & Zayanderoody, M. (2023). Analysis of the Welfare Effects of Eliminating Subsidies on Basic Goods: An Application of the GTAP Model. Journal of Development and Capital. doi: 10.22103/jdc.2023.22518.1440. [In Persian]
Sharifi, H., Honarvar, N., & Mohammadi, M. (2012). Effects of Long-term Subsidies Elimination of Energy Carriers, Oil, Gas and Electricity on the Level of Production and Inflation in Iran. Iranian Journal of Energy15(1), 0-0. [In Persian]
Sharpe, A. (1999). A Survey of Indicators of Economic and Social Well-being. Ottawa: Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework, Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, Springer New York, 9, 281-314.
Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework. Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications, 281-314.
Solaymani, S., Kari, F., & Hazly Zakaria, R. (2014). Evaluating the Role of Subsidy Reform in Addressing Poverty Levels in Malaysia: A CGE Poverty Framework. Journal of Development Studies50(4), 556-569.‏ [In Persian]
Sowa, N., & Edpri, A. (2007). The Role of Subsidies as a Means to Increase Welfare. WWF Roundtable.  https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/role_subsidies_increase_welfare_2.pdf.
Sunita, Sh., & Mahendra, L. (2022). A Critical Analysis of Government Subsidies in India – Special Reference to Non-Merit Subsidies. Research hub, 9(2):28-33. Doi: 10.53573/rhimrj. 2022.v09i02.006   
Tashkini, A., Shafiei, A., & Ariani, B. (2008). Characteristics of the Current System of Payment of Subsidies for Energy Carriers in Iran and the Requirements. Deputy of Planning and Economic Studies, Economic Studies Office. [In Persian]                                   
Vafaei, E., Mohammadzadeh, P., Fallahi, F., & Asgharpour, H. (2017). The Convergence of Social Welfare in the Iranian Provinces Using Spatial STAR Nonlinear Technique. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 4(2), 79-102. [In Persian]
Wu, S., & Liu, X. (2023). Government Subsidies, Cooperation between Land and Sea Enterprises and Profit Maximization -Data Simulation Based Differential Game Study. Research Square, DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2419183/v1.
Yang, Z., & Tang, M. (2019). Welfare Analysis of Government Subsidy Programs for Fuel-efficient Vehicles and New Energy Vehicles in China. Environmental and Resource Economics74(2), 911-937.
He, Y., Yu, Y., Guo, X., & Li, D. Q. (2023). Government Subsidy and Firm's Cost Sharing in Sustainable Agriculture Supply Chain. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, doi: 10.1111/ijfs.16465.
Zaroki, S., & Moghadasi Sedehi, A. (2021). The Role of Boom and Recession in Energy Consumption of Sectors with Emphasis on Electricity and Non-Electricity. Economic Modelling, 15(53), 97-124. [In Persian]
Zaroki, S., Nasrnejad Nesheli, S., & Gorgani Firoozjah, N. (2023). Exploring the Role of Inflation across Different Commodity Groups on Economic Welfare in Iran. Economics Research23(88), 158-202. Doi: 10.22054/joer.2024.75021.1148. [In Persian]
Zaroki, S., Tavassoli-Nia, A., Nasrnejad Nesheli, S., & Khalili, Z. (2023). Analysis of the Role of Underground Economy in Economic Welfare. Public Sector Economics Studies1(2), 141-162. doi: 10.22126/pse.2023.8356.1011. [In Persian]