Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University,Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

Abstract

 Financing remains one of the most critical aspects of business growth and sustainability. The Initial Coin Offering (ICO) method, a novel approach to financing leveraging blockchain technology, has garnered attention due to its ability to attract significant capital globally within a short period and without requiring intermediaries. Understanding and analyzing the factors that influence the success or failure of ICOs is thus valuable for businesses and investors alike. This paper examines the factors impacting ICO success using logistic regression analysis, focusing on 307 completed ICO projects from 2016 to 2018. We consider two target success variables: "Total funds collected" and "Hard cap achievement percentage." Factors related to the project, campaign, social networks, and team characteristics were analyzed in separate models. Through model selection based on performance and feature prioritization using the Permutation Importance (PI) technique, the findings highlight that having a well-defined "Business model available" significantly contributes to ICO success across both models. Additionally, the top features in the first selected model under the categories of project, campaign, and social network are "White paper pages," "Token share for presale investors," and "GitHub account," respectively. In the second model, the most impactful factors are "Use of proceeds mentioned" and "Length of crowdsale" under the project and campaign categories.
 
Introduction
Creating a stable foundation for business growth requires sustained financial support, as financing is a central pillar of business continuity. The Initial Coin Offering (ICO) method represents an innovative financing avenue, leveraging blockchain technology to enable rapid capital acquisition from a global investor base without intermediary involvement. By examining the mechanics of ICOs and analyzing factors that influence their success or failure, this study aims to expand theoretical insights into ICOs, prevent inefficient trends, and promote the optimal utilization of this financing method.
Methods and Material
To identify factors impacting the success of ICO campaigns, this study collected data on 307 ICO projects from 2016 to 2018, categorizing them into four dimensions: project, campaign, social network, and team characteristics. Two target variables were used to assess ICO success: "Total raised capital during ICO" for the first set of four models, and "Percentage of hard cap (the maximum capital set by project founders) raised" for the second set. The logistic regression algorithm, a supervised machine learning technique for binary classification, was employed to predict the probability of success or failure. A cumulative process approach was used to create and analyze the research model.
Results and Discussion
After optimizing logistic regression structures across eight research models, the highest prediction accuracy was observed among the first four models using "Total raised capital during ICO" as the dependent variable. Models 1-3, with independent variables focusing on project, campaign, and social network characteristics, achieved 70% accuracy based on the weighted average of Precision for both success and failure groups and 72% for Recall. This result indicates the model’s high effectiveness in predicting unsuccessful ICOs.
In the second set of models, using "Percentage of hard cap raised" as the dependent variable, model 2-2 (with independent variables for project and campaign characteristics) showed the best performance, achieving 67% and 74% accuracy for precision in both groups and 93% Recall accuracy for unsuccessful groups (31% for successful groups). Consequently, models 1-3 and 2-2 were selected for their high accuracy in predicting ICO campaign success or failure.
The Permutation Importance (PI) technique identified the top influential features in each model. For model 1-3, the most critical factors were "White paper pages," "Certainty of presale token share for investors," and "Project business model accessibility." In model 2-2, the leading features included "Mentioned use of proceeds," "Availability of business model," and "Crowdsale duration." Notably, in model 1-3, the most effective features by category were "White paper pages" (project), "Token share presale investors" (campaign), and "GitHub account" (social network). For model 2-2, the prominent features were "Use of proceeds mentioned" and "Crowdsale length" within project and campaign categories, respectively.
Conclusion
The findings reveal that the most influential variables across models 1-3 and 2-2 are:

Project category: "White paper page count" and "Use of proceeds mentioned."
Campaign category: "Token share presale investors" and "Crowdsale length."
Social network category: "Active GitHub account availability."

Key features, such as "White paper pages," "Token share presale investors," and "GitHub account" in model 1-3, along with "Use of proceeds mentioned" and "Crowdsale length" in model 2-2, emerged as the most significant factors for ICO success. The prominence of campaign characteristics in both optimal models underscores their critical role in ICO outcomes. This research suggests that addressing informational gaps and identifying success factors can facilitate the responsible and effective adoption of ICOs. By focusing on these pivotal features, businesses can enhance their likelihood of success while streamlining their financing strategies through ICOs.

Keywords

چیت­ساز، احسان.، و بیگدلی، محمد. (1400)، عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت تأمین مالی جمعی به روش عرضه­ی اولیه­ی بهامُهر از طریق صرافی­های آنلاین. توسعه کارآفرینی، دورة 14، شمارة 2، تابستان 1400، صفحات 221-.240
چیت ساز، احسان.، قربانی حصاری، محمد و فیلی، هشام. (1399)، شناسایی عوامل موثر بر عدم موفقیت تامین مالی جمعی مبتنی بر بلاکچین با استفاده از عرضه اولیه بهامهر. توسعه کارآفرینی، بهار 1399، شماره 47.
خادم علیزاده، امیر. (1392)، تأثیر بازار سرمایه بر رشد اقتصادی در ایران(1370-1390) با استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل مؤلفه­های اصلی (PCA). فصلنامه پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، شماره ،50 پاییز ،1392 صفحات 8.
Ackermann, E., Bock, C., Bürger, R. (2020). Democratising Entrepreneurial Finance: The Impact of Crowdfunding and Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). In: Moritz, A., Block, J.H., Golla, S., Werner, A. (eds) Contemporary Developments in Entrepreneurial Finance. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham, First edition.
Adhami, S. Giudici, G., & Martinazzi, S. (2018). Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 64–75.
Ahmad, M. F., Kowalewski, O., Pisany, P. (2021). What Determines Initial Coin Offering Success: A Cross-Country Study, IÉSEG Working Paper Series 2020-ACF-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3735889
Albrecht, S., Lutz, B., & Neumann, D. (2019). The behavior of blockchain ventures on Twitter as a determinant for funding success. Electronic Markets, 30, 241–257.
Amsden, R. and Schweizer, D. (2018). Are Blockchain Crowdsales the New 'Gold Rush'? Success Determinants of Initial Coin Offerings. SSRN (Social Science Research Network),SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3163849.
An, J., Duan, T., Hou, W., & Xu, X. (2019). Initial Coin Offerings and Entrepreneurial Finance: The Role of Founders’ Characteristics. The Journal of Alternative Investments, 21(4), 26-40.
Anson, M. (2018). Initial coin Offering: Economic Reality of Virtual Economics?. Journal of Private Equity, 21(4),41-52.
Biasi, J., & Chakravorti, S. (2019). The Future of Cryptotokens. Disruptive Innovation in Business and Finance in the Digital World. vol.20. 167-187.
Ayarci, N., & A. O. Birkan. (2020). Determinants of ICO Investment Decision: An Exploratory Factor Analysis. International Journal of Financial Research ,11 (5): 69–78. doi: 10.5430/ijfr. v11n5p69.
Block, J.H., Groh, A., Hornuf, L. et al. (2021). The entrepreneurial finance markets of the future: a comparison of crowdfunding and initial coin offerings. Small Bus Econ, 57, 865–882.
Bourveau, T., George, E. T., Ellahie, A., & Macciocchi, D. (2018). Initial Coin Offerings: Early Evidence on the Role of Disclosure in the Unregulated Crypto Market. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 60 No. 1.
Brochado, A. (2018). Snapshot das Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). (CMVM, Ed.) Cadernos do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários, 60, 53-76.
Campino, José Pedro Meira, Brochado, Ana, & Rosa, Álvaro (2022). Initial coin offerings (ICOs): Why do they succeed?. Financial Innovation.vol. 8, issue 1, 1-35
Campino, J., Brochado, A. & Rosa, Á. (2021). Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs): the importance of human capital. Journal of Business Economics.Vol 91, 1225-1262.
Chen, R. R., & Chen, K. (2020). A perspective on Information asymmetry in initial coin offerings (ICOs): Investigating the effects of multiple channel signals. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 40.
Chitsaz, E. and Begdali, M. (2021). Identifying the Success Factors Affecting Entrepreneurial Finance using Initial Dex Offering. Entrepreneurship Development.13(1). 2-1. [In Persian]
Chitsaz, E. Ghorbani Hesari, M. and Fili, H. (2020), Identifying the failure factors for crowdfunding using initial coin offering. Entrepreneurship Development.12(1). 21-40. [In Persian]
Chiu, I. H., & Greene, E. F. (2019). The Marriage of Technology, Markets and Sustainable (and) Social Finance: Insights from ICO Markets for a New Regulatory Framework. European Business Organization Law Review, 20, 139-169.
Cui, X., Shibata, T. (2017). Investment strategies, reversibility, and asymmetric information. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 263, issue 3, 1109-1122.
European Security and Market Authority (ESMA) (2019). Advice Initial Coin Offerings and Crypto-Assets. 9 January 2019 | ESMA50-157-1391.
Fadlallah, Haïssam (2023). Technical and legal framework of Initial coin offerings. International Review of Law.Vol. 12, no. 1
Fahlenbrach, R., & Frattaroli, M. (2020). ICO investors. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management.vol. 35.1–59.
Fisch, C. (2019). Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 1–22.
Fisch, C., & Momtaz, P.P. (2020). Institutional investors and post-ICO performance: an empirical analysis of investor returns in initial coin offerings (ICOs). Journal of Corporate Finance, 64.
Giudici, G., & Adhami, S. (2019). The impact of governance signals on ICO fundraising success. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46, 283–312.
Greiner, M., Pfeiffer, D., Smith, R.D., (2000). Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Elsevier, 30 May 2000.
Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. H. (2023). Machinery Learning models. chapter 5, Oxford University, Londen.
Khadim Alizadeh, A. (2012). The effect of the capital market on economic growth in Iran (1370-1390) using the principal component analysis (PCA) approach. Journal of Economic Research, 13(50), 87-121. [In Persian]
Momtaz, P.P. (2020). Initial coin offerings, asymmetric information, and loyal CEOs. Small Business Economics. Vol. 57. 975-997.
Liu, C., & Wang, H. (2019). Initial Coin Offerings: What Do We Know and What Are the Success Factors? (edited by In S. Goutte, K. Guesmi, & S. Saadi). Cryptofinance and Mechanisms of Exchange. Springer, Cham, First edition. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30738-7.
Myalo, A.S. (2019). Comparative Analysis of ICO, DAOICO, IEO and STO. Case Study, Vol. 23, No. 6, 6–25.
Robinson II, Randolph, The New Digital Wild West: Regulating the Explosion of Initial Coin Offerings (September 1, 2017). 85 Tenn. L. Rev., 897 (2018).
Roosenboom, P. Kolk, T. and Jong, A. (2020). What determines success in Initial Coin Offerings? Venture Capital. vol. 22.161-183.
Rrustemi, J., & Tuchschmid, N. S. (2020). Fundraising Campaigns in a Digital Economy: Lessons from a Swiss Synthetic Diamond Venture's Initial Coin Offering (ICO). Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(6).
Salman Mahiny, A., Turner, B.J. (2003). Modeling past vegetation change through remote sensing and g.i.s: a comparison of neural networks and logistic regression methods. School of Resources, Environment and Society, the Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia.
Sidiki, S. (2014). Startup Financing Trends in Europe, Tilburg University Law School. 1-65.
Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
Xuan, M., Zhu, X., & Zhao, J. L. (2020). Impact of Social Media on Fundraising Success in Initial Coin Offering (ICO): An Empirical Investigation. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), (pp. 6-22). Dubai.
 Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2020.