Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor ,Faculty of Economics,Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Computer engineering student ,Faculty of Statistics, Mathematics and Computer, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Master of Research in Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

Abstract

 In recent years, with the increased availability of data and statistics, particularly multi-country input-output tables and firm-level microdata, along with advances in the data processing capacity of personal computers for managing these vast datasets, as well as information and communication infrastructure, the efficient shared use of databases for foreign trade analysis has become possible. The goal of this paper is to implement the gross export decomposition method by Borin and Mancini (2023), using a source-based approach and the perspective of the exporting country, as a foundational analysis for decomposing value-added in the gross exports of Iran’s economic activities.
The contribution of this paper to the economic literature on Iran can be summarized in the following three aspects: First, it utilizes data from the 2016 inter-country input-output database, including data on Iran, for empirical documentation. Second, it focuses on the most recent theoretical framework presented by Borin and Mancini (2023), with a source-based approach and country perspective, to decompose the value-added in the exports of Iran’s economic activities. Third, it offers a structural interpretation of the value-added decomposition of Iran's exports for the year 2016, which can be useful for researchers and policymakers in understanding the global value chains of Iran’s economic activities. The results show that Iran plays a small and fragile role in the global economy.
Introduction
The global economy has become increasingly interconnected, necessitating comprehensive tools to understand complex trade relationships. Traditional trade statistics, which rely on gross export values, often obscure the actual value added by countries. The emergence of inter-country input-output tables allows for a detailed examination of value-added flows within international trade networks. These tables track the production processes across different countries, shedding light on how value is added at each stage of production. This paper builds on the gross export decomposition framework developed by Borin and Mancini (2023), which enables a nuanced analysis of value-added in exports. By applying this framework to Iran's economic activities, we can gain a clearer picture of how different sectors contribute to the country's export economy. This approach provides a more accurate reflection of Iran's role in global value chains (GVCs), moving beyond traditional metrics that may understate or overstate its economic contributions.
The study utilizes the Inter-Country Input-Output(ICIO) database for the year 2016 which includes Iran, which provides comprehensive data on trade and production relationships among various countries. The ICIO database is particularly suited for this analysis as it captures the interconnected nature of global trade and production networks. The Borin and Mancini (2023) methodology involves decomposing gross exports into three main components: The domestic value-added (DVA), that is value-added exported in final or intermediate goods. This is part of the Domestic Content – the part of exports that originated in the country – and is also a measure of GDP in gross exports or in intermediates absorbed by direct importers. The foreign value-added (FVA) that is value-added contained in intermediate inputs imported from abroad, exported in the form of final or intermediate goods. This is part of the Foreign Content – the part of gross exports that originated abroad. The returned value-added is domestic VA in intermediates exported. By applying this decomposition method, we can analyze the contribution of various sectors to Iran's export economy. This analysis involves several steps:

Data Preparation: Extracting relevant data from the ICIO database for Iran and its trading partners.
Decomposition Calculation: Applying the Borin and Mancini (2023) method to decompose Iran's gross exports into DVA, FVA, and RDVA.
Sectoral Analysis: Examining the results to identify key sectors contributing to Iran's value-added exports.

Results and Discussion
The results reveal significant insights into the structure of Iran's export economy. In 2016, Iran's gross exports were composed predominantly of Domestic Value Added (DVA), reflecting the substantial contribution of domestic industries to the country's exports. The analysis shows that the oil and gas sector plays a crucial role in generating DVA, given Iran's abundant natural resources.
However, the study also highlights the presence of Foreign Value Added (FVA) in Iran's exports. This indicates that foreign inputs are integrated into Iran's production processes, demonstrating the interconnectedness of Iran's economy with global supply chains. For instance, machinery and equipment imported from other countries are essential for Iran's manufacturing sector, contributing to the FVA in its exports. The Returned Domestic Value-Added component, although smaller, provides interesting insights into the circular nature of some value-added flows. This component illustrates how certain domestic value-added returns to Iran after being processed abroad. For example, raw materials exported from Iran may be processed into intermediate goods in other countries and then re-imported for further manufacturing. The application of the Borin and Mancini (2023) value-added decomposition method provides a detailed and nuanced understanding of Iran's export economy. By distinguishing between Domestic Value Added (DVA), Foreign Value Added (FVA), and Returned Domestic Value Added (REF), this analysis offers a comprehensive view of how different sectors contribute to Iran's gross exports.
Conclusion
The study reveals that while Iran's export economy is heavily reliant on domestic industries, it is also deeply from oil and mining interconnected with global supply chains. Furthermore, the Returned Domestic Value-Added component highlights the circular nature of some value-added flows, illustrating the complexity of global trade relationships. For policymakers and researchers, these insights are invaluable. Understanding the composition of Iran's export economy can inform strategies to enhance domestic industries' competitiveness and better integrate into global value chains. Additionally, recognizing the role of foreign inputs in domestic production can guide policies aimed at improving the efficiency and resilience of supply chains. In summary, the value-added decomposition method employed in this study offers a robust framework for analyzing Iran's export economy. It provides a clearer picture of how domestic and foreign industries interact within global trade networks, offering valuable insights for enhancing Iran's economic performance in the context of global value chains.

Keywords

Amador, J., and Cabral, S. )2016(. Global value chains: a survey of drivers and measures: global value chains: a survey of drivers and measures. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 278-301, doi: 10. 1111/joes. 12097
Antràs, P. & Chor, D. (2017). Organizing the Global Value Chain. Econometrica ,81(6): 2127- 2204.
Antràs, P., and E. Helpman. (2004). Global Sourcing. Journal of Political Economy 112 (3): 552–80.
Baldwin R. (2016). The great convergence. Harvard University Press.
Baldwin, R., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2014). Trade-in-goods and trade-in-tasks: An integrating framework. Journal of International Economics, 99(3), 51-62.
Baldwin, R. (2006). Globalization: The Great Unbundling(s). Helsinki: Economic Council of Finland.
Baldwin, R. )2022. (Globotics and macroeconomics: globalisation and automation of the service sector. NBER Working Paper No. 30317, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bernard, A. B., and J. B. Jensen. (1995). Exporters, Jobs, and Wages in U. S. Manufacturing, 1976–1987. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics, Vol. 1995 (pp. 67–119), Washington, DC.
Borin, A., & Mancini, M. (2019). Measuring What Matters in Global Value Chains and Value-Added Trade. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8804.
Borin, M. Mancini. )2023(. Measuring what matters in value-added trade. Economic Systems Research, p 1-28. https://doi. org/10. 1080/09535314. 2022. 2153221
Campa, J., and L. Goldberg. (1997). The Evolving External Orientation of Manufacturing Industries: Evidence from Four Countries. NBER Working Paper, No. 5919, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
Daudin, G., Rifflart, C. & Schweisguth, D. (2011). Who Produces for Whom in the World Economy? Canadian Journal of Economics, 44 (4): 1403–37.
Dedrick, J., K. Kraemer, and G. Linden. (2008). Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains? A Study of the iPod and notebook PCs. Report prepared for the Sloan Industry Studies Annual Conference, Boston, May 1–2.
Degain, Christophe., Lin Jones, Zhi Wang, and Li Xin. (2014). The Similarities and Differences among Three Major Inter-Country Input-Output Databases and Their Implications for Trade in Value-Added Estimates.USITC Working Paper 2014-12B. https://www. usitc. gov/publications/332/ec201412b. pdf.
Dietzenbacher, E., I. Romero, and N. S. Bosma. (2005). Using Average Propagation Lengths to Identify Production Chains in the Andalusian Economy. Estudios de Economia Aplicada ,23 (2): 405–22.
Fally, T. (2012). Production Staging: Measurement and Facts. mimeo UC Berkeley.
Feas, E. (2023). Decomposition of value added in gross exports: a critical review. Applied Economic Analysis. Emerald Publishing Limited. 2632-7627. DOI 10. 1108/AEA-11-2022-0300
Feenstra, R. C., & Taylor, A. M. (2017). International trade. Worth Publishers, New York, Chapter 4.
Feenstra, R. C. & Hanson, G. H. (1996). Globalization, Outsourcing, and Wage Inequality. American Economic Review ,86 (2), 240–45.
Ferrantino, Michael Joseph., & Schmidt, Gabriela. (2018). Using gross trade data to map archetypal GVCs. Policy Research Working Paper Series ,8296, The World Bank.
Foster-McGregor, N., & Stehrer, R. (2013). Value-added contents of trade: A comprehensive approach. Economic Letter, 2, 354-357.
Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, and T. Sturgeon. (2005). The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12.
Grossman, Gene M., and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. (2008). Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring. American Economic Review, 98 (5): 1978−97. https://doi. org/0. 1257/aer. 98. 5. 1978.
Grubel, H. G. and Lloyd, P. J. (1975). Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. Macmillan Press, London.
Hanson, Gordon H., Raymond J. Mataloni, and Matthew J. Slaughter. (2005). Vertical Production Networks in Multinational Firms. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87 (4), 664−78.
Helpman, E., and P. Krugman. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Huan, Samuel, Sunil Sheoran, and Ge Wang. (2004). A Review and Analysis of Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR) Model. Supply Chain Management 9 (1): 23−29.  https://www. emeraldinsight. com/doi/abs/10. 1108/13598540410517557h.
Hummels, D., Ishii J. & Yi, K. M. (2001). The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Journal of International Economics, 54, pp. 75-96.
Inomata, S., and B. Meng. (2013). Transnational Interregional Input-Output Tables: An Alternative Approach to MRIO? In Sustainability Practitioner’s Guide to Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis, edited by J. Murray and Lenzen, 33–42. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing.
Inomata, S. (2017). Analytical frameworks for global value chains: An overview. In Global Value Chain Development Report.Chapter7. World Trade Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jahangard, E)2024) Participation and Vertical Specialization in Iran's Economic Activities, International Journal of New Political Economy, Available Online from 18 April 2024. 10. 48308/jep. 2024. 234715. 1167
Jahangard, E and Jahangard, A. (2024). Value Added Decomposition of Iran's Gross Exports. Preprint from Research Square, 26 Jan 2024. https://doi. org/10. 21203/rs. 3. rs-3872393/v1 PPR: PPR793351.
Jahangard, Esfandiar, Ali Faridzad, Najmeh Sajadianfard, Jamal Kakaie, and Elahe Shokri (2023) Inserting of Iran in the ICIO Table. Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines, and Agriculture of Iran, Tehran. (in Persian).
Johnson, R. C. & Noguera, G. (2012). Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added. Journal of International Economics, 86, Iss. 2, 224-236.
Jones, Meryem Demirkaya, Erika Bethmann. )2019(. Global value chain analysis: concepts and approaches. Journal of International Commerce and Economics. https://www.usitc.gov/journals/jice_home.htm.
Jones, R., and H. Kierzkowski. (1990). the Role of Services in Production and International Trade: A Theoretical Framework. In the Political Economy of International Trade, edited by R. Jones and A. Krueger, 31–48. Oxford, U. K.: Basil Blackwell.
Koopman, R. Wang Z. & Wei, S. (2014). Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports. American Economic Review, 104(2): 459-94.
Koopman, Robert, William Powers, Zhi Wang, and Shang-Jin Wei. (2010). Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains. NBER Working Paper, w16426. https://www. nber. org/papers/w16426.
Lenzen, Manfred. (2019). Aggregating Input–Output Systems with Minimum Error. Economic Systems Research, 31, 594–616.
Los, Bart, Marcel P. Timmer, and Gaaitzen J. de Vries. )2016(. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports: Comment. American Economic Review, 107 (7): 1958–1966.
Melitz, M. J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica ,71 (6),1695–725.
Mohajeri, Parisa., and Banouei, Ali Asghar. (2021). Estimating Domestic Value Added in Gross Exports and Its Relation to Vertical Specialization: The Case Study of Iran, Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 10(1) 2021, 7-29.
Nagengast, A. J., and R. Stehrer. (2016). Collateral imbalances in intra-European trade? Accounting for the differences between gross and value-added trade balances. Discussion Papers from Deutsche Bundesbank. No 14/2014.
Sherkat Afsaneh,Aliasghar Banouei, Somayeh Shahhosseini, Fatemmeh Bazzaza and Azin Kianirad(2023)Application of Hypothetical Extraction and Conventional Method in Measuring Value-added in Trade: Equivalence or Different Result? Iranian Economic Development Analyses, Volume 9, Issue 1 - Serial Number 23.Pages 123-142 (in Persian).
Stehrer, Robert, Neil Foster, and Gaaitzen de Vries. (2012). Value Added and Factors in Trade: A Comprehensive Approach. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw) Working Paper 80. https://econpapers. repec. org/paper/wiiwpaper/80. htm.
Sturgeon, Timothy J., and Momoko Kawakami. (2011). Global Value Chains in the Electronics Industry: Characteristics, Crisis, and Upgrading Opportunities for Firms from Developing Countries. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation, and Development, 4 (1/2/3):https://EconPapers.repec. org/RePEc:ids:ijtlid:v:4:y:2011:i:1/2/3:p:120-147.
Wang, Z., S. Wei and K. Zhu. (2013). Quantifying International Production Sharingat the Bilateral and Sector Levels. NBER Working Paper, No. 19677.
Wang, Zhi, Shang-Jin Wei, Xinding Yu, and Kunfu Zhu. )2017(Measures of Participation in Global Value Chains and Global Business Cycles. NBER Working Paper 23222. https://www. nber. org/papers/w23222.
World Bank. (2019). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains, The World Bank, Washington, D. C., doi: 10. 1596/978-1-4648-1457-0.
Xing, Y., and N. Detert. (2010). How the iPhone Widens the United States Trade Deficit with the People’s Republic of China. Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Working Paper Series No 257, ADBI, Tokyo.
Yeats, A. J. (1998). Just How Big is Global Production Sharing? Policy Research Working Paper 1871, World Bank, Washington, DC.