Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Economic Sciences, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran

2 Master of Economics, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

 Economic growth models have long grappled with fundamental questions regarding the relationship between different types of capital and real growth rates. While numerous empirical studies have demonstrated the independent effects of physical capital and social capital on the quantity and quality of economic growth, less attention has been given to the interactive effects of these investment types. This study examines the influence of social capital on the interaction between physical capital and Iran's economic growth using the Smooth Transition Regression (STR) model. The analysis covers the period 1346–1400 (1967–2021) and employs four indicators inspired by Fukuyama's framework to measure social capital.
The findings indicate that the impact of physical capital on Iran's gross domestic product (GDP) varies across different levels of social capital. Periods of greater fluctuations in social capital have been associated with increased variability in the effect of physical capital on economic growth. Specifically, stronger social capital enhances the productivity of physical capital, while weaker social capital reduces its effectiveness.
This study highlights the critical role of social capital in shaping the returns on physical capital investments, suggesting that strategies to stabilize and strengthen social capital could lead to more consistent and sustainable economic growth outcomes.
 
Introduction
Economic growth, as a key driver of national welfare, has long captured the attention of not only economists but also social and political scientists. This interest stems from its profound impact on living standards, social stability, and political dynamics. Unstable economic conditions, linked to phenomena such as unemployment, inflation, and disparities in quality of life and life expectancy, can trigger social unrest and political crises. As such, understanding the determinants of economic growth is essential for shaping policies that foster sustainable development and prosperity.
One of the enduring questions in the study of economic growth concerns why nations or regions with similar resource endowments and economic conditions often experience divergent growth trajectories. This question remains partially unresolved, especially regarding the interplay of various forms of capital in driving economic outcomes.
This study focuses on examining the factors influencing Iran's gross domestic product (GDP), with a particular emphasis on the role of social capital in shaping the impact of physical capital over the period 1346–1400 (1967–2021). Specifically, the research investigates the threshold effect of social capital on the interaction between physical capital and GDP, exploring how varying levels of social capital influence the productivity of physical capital in the Iranian context.
A review of prior studies reveals mixed findings regarding the relationship between human capital and economic growth. While some research highlights a positive correlation, others argue that variables such as social capital and the broader developmental context mediate this relationship. Similarly, studies on the role of social capital in economic growth suggest its contribution, albeit often emphasizing its indirect role or relatively modest impact compared to other variables. This study seeks to build on these findings by specifically exploring the interaction between social capital, physical capital, and production, offering new insights into their combined effects on economic growth in Iran.
The study is structured into seven sections. Section 2 reviews the theoretical foundations underpinning the research. Section 3 explores the existing literature and contextual background of the study. Section 4 details the research methodology, while Sections 5 and 6 discuss the data and findings, respectively. Finally, Section 7 presents the conclusions and policy recommendations derived from the analysis.
Methods and Material
While linear estimation methods are simpler and often preferred for their ease of use, they are not always suitable for analyzing economic phenomena with inherently nonlinear behavior. Relying on linear models in such cases can lead to inaccurate specifications and misleading results, underscoring the need for more flexible nonlinear regression models.
In the context of social capital's impact on economic growth, the dynamics differ from the short-term effects of trade shocks or external economic fluctuations, which often have a pendulum-like nature. Instead, the erosion of social capital gradually distorts the economic landscape, exerting a prolonged and subtle influence on growth trajectories. These long-term and incremental changes necessitate a modeling approach capable of capturing both the gradual and nonlinear nature of these effects.
To address this, the Smooth Transition Regression (STR) model was selected for the analysis. The STR model offers significant flexibility by accommodating nonlinear relationships between variables without imposing restrictive or predefined functional forms. This approach allows for the modeling of transitional changes based on observations of the threshold variable, enabling the examination of how variables evolve and interact continuously across regimes.
In essence, the STR model is particularly suited to studying the nonlinear effects of social capital on GDP, as it captures the slow and progressive changes in economic outcomes resulting from variations in social capital. By employing a transfer function, the model identifies regime-dependent behaviors and thresholds, providing a comprehensive framework to analyze the nuanced relationship between social capital, physical capital, and economic growth over the long term.
Conclusion
This study aimed to investigate the role of social capital in the interaction with physical capital and its effect on Iran's GDP. Specifically, it explored how social capital influences economic growth both directly, as a production input, and indirectly, as a threshold variable that modulates the impact of other inputs, including physical capital.
The findings align with the broader literature, underscoring the pivotal role of social capital in differentiating the economic outcomes of nations. Social capital, reflected in the quality of governing institutions, their behavior, and their interactions with society, is confirmed to have a strong, two-way relationship with economic growth. Importantly, previous studies have highlighted that while measuring social capital quantitatively is challenging, its absence (manifested through phenomena such as crime or corruption) provides compelling evidence of its critical role.
Over the 54-year period of analysis (ending in 1400), this study employed Fukuyama's conceptual framework for social capital and utilized a smooth transition regression model with an exponential transfer function. The results validated the hypothesis that social capital significantly influences the interaction between physical capital and economic output. Specifically, periods of greater fluctuations in social capital were associated with more pronounced variations in the effect of physical capital on production.
Given the unique properties of social capital—particularly its tendency to depreciate if not actively utilized—this study recommends adopting strategies to bolster its presence in society. Drawing from the experiences of successful nations, the following steps are proposed:

Encouraging Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): Promote the activities of NGOs to foster public participation, especially among youth and elites, thereby building trust and strengthening social networks.
Reversing Brain Drain: Iran’s position as a major exporter of human resources underscores the need for policy reforms that create opportunities for the political participation of diverse groups. Ensuring inclusivity—irrespective of religion or political affiliation—can help rebuild public trust and attract expatriates with human and financial capital.
Strengthening Public Trust: As the cornerstone of social capital, public trust must be prioritized through transparency, equitable governance, and the provision of meaningful social roles for all citizens.

Ultimately, by fostering social capital and leveraging it to enhance the productivity of physical capital, Iran can create the foundation for sustainable economic growth and development.

Keywords

تقوی، مهدی و محمدی، حسین (1385). تأثیر سرمایه انسانی بر رشد اقتصادی ایران. پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، 6(22)، 43-15.
خداپرست، مهدی. فلاحی، محمدعلی و امیر، آریانا (1393). بررسی تأثیر سرمایه اجتماعی و آزادی اقتصادی بر رشد اقتصادی ایران. پژوهشنامه اقتصاد کلان، 9(17)، 98-75.
ذوالفقاری، اکبر و قیومی، آزاده (1402). فراتحلیل رابطه سرمایه اجتماعی و سلامت اجتماعی: پژوهش‌های بازه زمانی 1400-1390. فصلنامه راهبرد اجتماعی فرهنگی، 12(2)، 33-1.
رنانی، محسن و دلیری، حسن (1388). آیا سرمایه اجتماعی، واقعا سرمایه است؟. نشریه راهبرد توسعه، 5(3)، 170-147.
رنانی، محسن و رزیتا مؤیدفر (1391). چرخه‌های افول اخلاق و اقتصاد. انتشارات طرح نو.
سپهردوست، حمید و برجیسیان، عادل (1395). بررسی اثرات غیرمستقیم فساد بر رشد اقتصادی با تأکید بر شاخص ادراک فساد. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی اقتصاد مقداری، 13(1)، 29-1.
سوری، علی (1393). سرمایه اجتماعی و رشد در ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش‌ها و سیاست‌های اقتصادی، 22(69)، 64-49.
صیادزاده، علی و علمی، زهرا (1392). رابطه فساد و سرمایه اجتماعی در الگوهای رشد. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی رفاه اجتماعی، 13(50)، 7-37.
فرج زاده، زکریا. حمید، آزاده و عمرانی، محمد (1396). عوامل تعیین‌کنندۀ رشد اقتصادی در ایران، 52(3)، 686-663.
متوسلی، محمود. طیب­نیا، علی و محسن، حسنی (1390). سرمایه اجتماعی از دید رویکرد منفی فوکویاما در ایران. فصل­نامه­ فرآیند مدیریت و توسعه، 75، 24-1.
مفتخری، فاطمه. نادمی، یونس و کاوند، علی (1400). تأثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر رابطه سرمایه انسانی و رشد اقتصادی. پژوهشنامه اقتصاد کلان،16(31)، 20-1.
معبودی، رضا و دره‌نظری، زینب (1400). تحلیلی از سهم سرمایة اجتماعی در رشد اقتصادی در ایران طی دوره 1398 ـ 1381. فصلنامه مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی، 8(4)، 32-1.
مظفری، زانا (1400). اثر سرمایه انسانی بر رشد اقتصادی ایران، رهیافت GMM در سری‌های زمانی و منطق فازی. نشریه تحقیقات اقتصادی، 56(1)، 172-145.
Akpemah Bathuure, I. (2021). The Role of Social Capital and Social Innovation in Economic Growth.The Economic and Financeletters, 8(2), 231-250.
Akar, T. & Ay, A. (2018). Sosyal sermaye ve inovasyonun ekonomik biiyiime iizerindeki etkisi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, (58), 105-126.
Daňová, M., Širá, E. (2023). EDuCATIonAL AnD InnovATIvE ELEmEnTS of HumAn CApITAL AnD THEIR ImpACT on EConomIC GRowTH. Economy of Region. 19(1), 1-18.
Feki, Ch., (2019). The Impact of Social Capital and Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth: A Panel Data Approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(9), 320-333.
Gao Ho, G. (2021). Is knowledge spillover from human capital investment a catalyst for technological innovation? The curious case of fourth industrial revolution in BRICS economies. Elsevier, 162, 1-7.
Hao Ding, X., Huang, Y., Gao, W., & Min, W. (2021). A Comparative Study of the Impacts of Human Capital and Physical Capital on Building Sustainable Economies at Different Stages of Economic Development. Energies, MDPI, 14(19), 1-14.
Harris, R. L. (2023). We Are Each Other’s Business: Black Entrepreneurship, Trust, and the Mobilization of Social Capital. St. John Fisher University, 1-123.
Mwatu, Sh. (2023). Effect of Human Capital on Economic Growth in Austria: A Time Series Analysis. European Economics: Macroeconomics & Monetary Economics eJournal, 1-10.
Muringani, J., Fitjar, R. D. & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2021). Social capital and economic growth in the regions of Europe. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(6), 1412-1434.
Maaboudi, R., Dare Nazari, Z. (2021). An Analysis of the Share of Social Capital in Iran’s Economic Growth During the Years 2002-2019, Social Capital Management, 8(4), 1-32. [In Persian]
Mozaffari, Z. (2021). The Effect of Human Capital on Economic Growth in Iran; GMM in Time Series Approach and Fuzzy Logic. Tahghighat-E-Eghtesadi, 56(1), 145-172. [In Persian]
Moftakhari, D., Nademi., Y., & Kavand, A. (2022). The Effect of Social Capital on the Relationship between Human Capital and Economic Growth. Macroeconomics Research Letter, 16(31), 1-20. [In Persian].
Pilatin, A. (2022). IMPACT OF SOCIAL CAPITAL ON ECONOMIC GROWTH: A META-ANALYSIS. International Journal of Economics, Business and Politics, 6(2), 216-235.
Suseno, Y., Standing, C., Kiani, R., & Jackson, P. (2018). National innovation performance: the role of human capital and social capital. Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33(2), 1-15.
Souri, A. (2014). Social Capital and Growth in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 22(69). 49-64. [ In Persian]
Sayyadzadeh, A., Elmi, Z. (2014). Relationship between Corruption and Social Capital In The Growth Models. Social Welfare Quarterly, 13(50), 7-37. [In Persian]
Taghavi, M., Mohammadi, H. (2006). The Effect of Human Capital on Economic Growth: Case of Iran. Journal of Economic Research, 6(22), 15-43. [ In Persian]
Zolfaghari, A., Ghayumi, A. (2022). Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Social Capital and Social Health: Researches in the Period of 2011-2021. Socio-Cultural Strategy, 12(2). 1-33. [ In Persian][1]