Old Institutionalism Vs. Mainstream Economics: An Intellectual

Mashhadi-Ahmad, Mahmoud

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Mahmoud Mashhadi-Ahmad

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran

Abstract

In the arena of Economic thought, there has always been some intellectual confrontation between the two major economic schools, i.e. Institutionalism and Neoclassical economics. This challenge has taken place at different levels; ranging from the most fundamental levels which are principles of ontology and epistemology to higher levels of policy implications. This article is an attempt to address some of the aspects of this debate and the challenges created by it.
Neoclassical advocates claim that institutionalism suffers from lack of theory. Indeed, they try to nullify institutionalism as non-scientific school. But, suddenly these questions arise that "what is science, and what can be considered as science at all?" "Is neoclassical economics science and institutional economics not?" These questions are among the issues which are addressed in this article. It will be shown in this article that institutionalism has an important core of economic theories that turns it to a powerful paradigm. But, in order to understand this, we have to go beyond what is considered theory in neoclassical school. Furthermore we will go through other claims that these two schools hold against each other and address some of them such as realism, scope and precision of theory, and solidarity of paradigm. We will show that in some of these areas such as perception of reality and realism, the difference between these two schools of thought is essential.

Keywords

References

Ayres, C. E. (1951), “The Co-Ordinates of Institutionalism”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 47-55.

Ayres, C. E. (1962), The Theory of Economic Progress: A Study of the Fundamentals of Economic Development and Cultural Change, Schocken Books, New York.

Blaug, M. (1985). Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Boland, L. A. (1998), The Foundations of Economic Method. George Allen and Unwin, London, Boston and Sydney

Boulding, K. E. (1957), “A New Look at Institutionalism”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp.1-12.

Caldwell, B. J. (1982), Beyond Positivism Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century, London, Allen and Unwin.

Clark, J. M. and Raymond T. Bye (1925), “Problems of Economic Theory”, American Economic Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 56-61.

Cobb, J. C. (1927), “The Significance and Use of Data in the Social Sciences”, Economic Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 63-75.

Commons, J. R. (1931), ”Institutional Economics”, American Economic Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 648-657.

Commons, J. R. (1934), Institutional Economics, The Macmillan Company.

Copeland, M. A. (1931), ”Economic Theory and the Natural Science Point of View”, American Economic Reviem, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 67-79.

Copeland, M. A. (1958), Fact and Theory in Economics: The Testament of an Institutionalist, Cornell University Press.

Dow, Sheila C. (1997), ”Mainstream Economic Methodology”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 73-93.

Gruchy, Allan G. (1948), Modern Economic Thought: The American Contribution, New York.

Gruchy, Allan G. (1957), “A New Look at Institutionalism: Disdussion” The American Economic Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 13-15.

Knight, F. H. (1952), “Institutionalism and Empiricism in Economics”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 45-55.

Landreth, H. (1976), History of Economic Theory: Scope, Method, and Content, Houghton Mifflin.

Mills, F. C. (1924). “on Measurement in Economics”. In R. G. Tugwell, ed., The Trend of Economics, 35-70, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Mills. F. C. (1928), “The Present Status and Future Prospects of Quantitative Economics“, Round Table Discussion, American Economic Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 28-45.

Mirowski, P. (1989), More Heat than Light, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Mitchell, W. C. (1913), Business Cycles, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Mitchell, Wesley C. (1925), “Quantitative Analysis in Economic Theory”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-12.

Mitchell, Wesley C. (1944), “Facts and Values in Economics”, The Journal of philosophy, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 212-219.

Mitchell, W. C. (1969), Types of Economic Theory from Mercantilism to Institutionalism, Vol.1. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.

Mitchell, W. C. (1969), Types of Economic Theory from Mercantilism to Institutionalism, Vol. 2. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.

Ramstaad, Y. (1986), “A Pragmatist’s Quest of Holistic Knowledge”, Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 20, pp. 1067-1106.

Rutherford, Malcolm (2001), “Institutional Economics: Then and Now”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.173-194.

Rutherford, M. (2007), “American Institutional Economics in the Interwar Period”, in A Companion to the History of Economic Thought, edited by: Warren J. Samuels, Jeff E. Biddle, and John B. Davis, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Samuels, W. J. (2000), ”Institutional Economics after One Century”, Journal of economic Issues, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 305-315.

Stanfield, J. R. (1999), “The Scope, Method, and Significance of Original Institutional Economics”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 231-255.

Tool, M.B. (1977). A Social Value Theory in Neoinstitutional Economics; Journal of Economic Issues, 11, No. 4, pp. 820-843

Tugwell, R. G. (1924), The Trend of Economics, ed., New York, Alfred, A. Knopf.

Veblen, Thorstein (1898), “Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science?”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 373-397.

Wolfe, Albert B. (1924). “Functional Economics”. Dans TUGWELL R.G. (ed.), The Trend of Economics, pp. 77-113.

Working, H. (1927), “The Use of the Quantitative Method in the Study of Economic Theory”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 18-24.

Yonay, Y. P. (1998), The Struggle over the Soul of Economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economists in America between the Wars, PrincetonUniversity Press.

Economics Research

Old Institutionalism Vs. Mainstream Economics: An Intellectual

References

References

Volume 15, Issue 57 - Serial Number 2
July 2015
Pages 1-38

Old Institutionalism Vs. Mainstream Economics: An Intellectual

References

References

Volume 15, Issue 57 - Serial Number 2July 2015Pages 1-38

Volume 15, Issue 57 - Serial Number 2
July 2015
Pages 1-38