Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Abstract

Veblen was one of the most famous founding fathers of institutionalism who, with his pioneering studies, revolutionized economics in all its intellectual and philosophical traditions of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. His scientific works were so influential that there are still a lot of endeavors to find out his viewpoints.
Considering the unparalleled role of him in the development of institutional economics, this paper will specifically study different aspects of his ideas and thoughts. In fact, the important point is that what are the main theories and ideas of this great savant? What aspects of conventional economics were insufficient that encouraged him to build a school with the name of institutional economics? What was his methodological approach to economics? What kind of transformations this approach has created in the scope of economic knowledge? Veblen's unique vision makes such questions regarding his thoughts as considerable important ones. For, in the history of economic thought, his attack to epistemological and methodological foundations of conventional economics is one of the most serious ones. In this context, this paper will address the above questions, and scrutinize a few aspects of his important achievements and will represent some of the epistemological, methodological and theoretical innovations of his works. 

Keywords

دیلینی، تیم (1387)، نظریه‌های کلاسیک جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمة بهرنگ صدیقی و وحید طلوعی، تهران، نشر نی، چاپ اول.
کوزر، لوئیس آلفرد (1368)، زندگی و اندیشه بزرگان جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمة محسن ثلاثی، تهران، انتشارات علمی،چاپ یازدهم.
گالبرایت، کنت (1387)، سیری در اقتصاد معاصر، ترجمة عباس قانع بصیری و محسن قانع بصیری، تهران، نشر فرزان روز، چاپ دوم.
وبلن، تورستین (1383)، نظریه طبقه مرفه، ترجمة فرهنگ ارشاد، نشر نی.
Chavance, Bernard (2009), Institutional Economics, Translated from the French by Francis Wells, Routledge.
Coats, A. W (1954), The Influence of Veblen Methodology, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 62, No. 6.
Davis, A. K (1957), Thorstein Veblen Reconsidered, Science and Society, Vol. 21, No. 1.
Hamilton, D (1999), Evolutionary Economics: A Study of Change in Economic Thought, Transaction Publishers, 1999.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M (1998),  Evolutionary Economics, in The Hanbook of Economic Methodology, edited by: J. B. Davis, D. W. Hands and U. Maki, Edward Elgar publishing Limited & Lansdown Place.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M, (2004), the Evolution of Institutional Economics; Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, Routledge.
Homan, Paul T (1932), An Appraisal of Institutional Economics, The American Economic Review, Vol. 22, No.1.
Hodder, H. J (1956), The Political Ideas of Thorstein Veblen, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, Vol. 22.
Lowe, Adolph (1980), What Is Evolutionary Economics?, Journal of Economic, Issues, Vol. XIV, No. 2, June.
Potts, Jason (2003), Evolutionary Economics, Policy, Vol.19, No.1.
Seckler, David (1975), Thorstein Veblen and the Institutionalists, The Macmillan Press LTD.
Stanfield, J. R (1999), The Scope, Method, and Significance of Original Institutional Economics, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXXIII, No.2.
Tilman, R. & T. Knapp (1999), John Dewey’s Unknown Critique of Marginal Utility Doctrine: Instrumentalism, Motivation, and Values, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 35(4).
Veblen, Thorstein B (1898), Why is Economics not An Evolutionary Science?, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.12, No. 4.
Veblen, Thorstein B (1904), The Theory of Business Enterprise, New York, Charles Scribners.
Veblen, Thorstein B (1909), The Limitation of Marginal Utility, the Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 17, No. 9.
Veblen, Thorstein B (1914), The Instinct of Workmanship and The State of The industrial Arts, New York, Macmillan.
Veblen, Thorstein B (1919), The Vested Interests and The Common Man, New York, Huebsch.
Veblen, Thorstein B (1921), The Engineers and The Price System, New York.
Veblen, Thorstein B (1962 [1918]), The Higher Learning In America:A Memorandum on The Conduct of Universities by Business Men, New York, (1918) Reprinted by Hill & Wang, 1962.