نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد دانشکده اقتصاد دانشگاه تهران

2 دانشجوی دکترا

چکیده

مساله‌ ذهنیت و نسبت تعاملی آن با زمینه‌ اجتماعی و نهادی از جمله مسایلی است که به تازگی در رهیافت‌های نوین در حوزه‌ تبیین کنش انسانی در نظریه‌های اجتماعی و اقتصادی مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. کاستی‌های برآمده از فردگرایی روش‌شناختی خام که پدیده‌های اجتماعی را فارغ از تعامل‌ها و روابط میان‌فردی تبیین می‌کنند، ضرورت به میان آوردن رویکردهای تفسیرگرا در تحلیل این پدیده‌ها را بیش از پیش آشکار ساخته است. این مقاله می‌کوشد تا با واکاوی ذهنی‌گرایی و ارتباط هستی‌شناختی گریزناپذیر آن با زمینه‌ اجتماعی، راه را برای درک بهتر مفهوم میان‌ذهنیت فراهم سازد. در این راه، ضمن کاوش در مضامین نظری مستتر در مواضع معرفت‌شناسانه‌ برخی از بزرگ‌ترین متفکران مکتب اتریشی علم اقتصاد، کنش خلاق کارآفرین -به مثابه‌ یکی از پیش‌ران‌های اصلی توسعه- را در چارچوب مفهومی تفسیرگرا و نهادگرایانه بازتعریف می‌شود و ضمن نقد اجمالی رویکردهای مسلط در این حوزه، میان‌ذهنیت به عنوان یکی از مولفه‌های تبیین‌گر آن معرفی می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

بنتون، تد؛ کرایب، یان (1384)، فلسفه علوم اجتماعی، ترجمه‌ شهناز مسماپرست و محمود متحد، تهران: نشر آگه.
جاودانی، حمید (1392)، دانشگاه‌ها و جهانی‌شدن: مفاهیم و رویکردها، تهران: موسسه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزش عالی.
کالدول، بروس (1388)، چالش‌هایک: زندگی نامه فکری‌هایک، ترجمه‌ غلامرضا آزاد (ارمکی) و ا. آزاد (ارمکی)، تهران: نشر نی.
بلاگ، مارک (1380)، روش‌شناسی علم اقتصاد، ترجمه‌ غلامرضا آزاد ارمکی، تهران: نشر نی.
Alvarez, S. A. and J. B. Barney (2007), “Discovery and Creation: Alternative Theories of Entrepreneurial Action”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1-2), 11-26.
Baron, R. A. and M. D. Ensley (2006), “Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs”, Management Science, 52(9), 1331-1344.
Blanchflower, D. G. and A. J. Oswald (1998), “What Makes an Entrepreneur?”, Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 26-60.
Boettke, P. J. (1994), The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics, London: Edward Elgar.
Cantillon, R. (2010 [1755]), An Essay on Economic Theory, Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Coddington, A. (1983), Keynesian Economics: The Search for First Principles, London: George Allen and Unwin.
Commons, J. R. (1950), The Economics of Collective Action, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Csontos, L. (1998), Subjectivism and Ideal Types: Lachmann and the methodological legacy of Max Weber. In R. Koppl, and G. Mongiovi, Subjectivism and Economic Analysis (PP. 80-103), London: Routledge.
de Soto, J. H. (2008), The Austrian School: Market Order and Entrepreneurial Creativity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Dimov, D. P. (2007), “Beyond the Single-Person, Single-Insight Attribution in Understanding Entrepreneurial Opportunities”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(5), 713-31.
Ebeling, R. M. (1994). “Expectations and expectation formation in Mises’s theory of the market process” In P. a. D.L.Prychitko, The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Eckhardt, J. T. and S. A. Shane (2003), “Opportunities and Entrepreneurship”, Journal of Management, 29(3), 333-49.
Fayolle, A. (2007), Entrepreneurship and New Value Creation: The Dynamic of the Entrepreneurial Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fullbrook, E. (2002), “Introduction: Why intersubjectivity?” In E. Fullbrook, Intersubjectivity in Economics (PP. 1-10). New York: Routledge.
Gaglio, M. and J. A. Katz (2001), “The Psychological Basis of Opportunity Identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness”, Small Business Economics, 16, 95-111.
Hayek, F. v. (1937), “Economics and Knowledge”, Economica, 4, 33-54.
Hayek, F. v. (1948), Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago
Hayek, F. v. (1967), Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, London: Routledge and Kegan   
Hodgson, G. M. (2002), “Reconstructive Downward Causation: Social structure and the development of individual agency”, In E. Fullbrook, Intersubjectivity in Economics (PP. 159-180). New York: Routledge.
Hodgson, G. M. (2003, March), The Hidden Persuaders: Institutions and Individuals in Economic Theory, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 159-75.
Hodgson, G. M. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics, New York: Routledge.
Hodgson, G. M. (2006, March), “What Are Institutions?”, Journal of Economic Issues, XL (1). Retrieved from http://www.geoffrey-hodgson.info/user/bin/whatareinstitutions.pdf
Holmes, M. R., T. R. Holcomb, P. G. Klein and R. D. Irelan, (2014), “A Judgmental Decision-Making Approach to Entrepreneurship: Toward a Behavioral Model”, Academy of Management, doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2014.15844
Kincaid, H. (1998), “Methodological Individualism/Atomism”, In J. B. Davis, The Handbook of Economic Methodology (PP. 294-300), London: Edawrd Elgar.
Kirzner, I. M. (1973), Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kirzner, I. M. (1979), Perception, Opportunity, and Profit, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kirzner, I. M. (1997), “Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach”, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60-85.
Klein, P. G. and P. L. Bylund (2014), “The Place of Austrian Economics in Contemporary Entrepreneurship Research”, The Review of Austrian Economics, 27(3), 259-279.
Knight, F. H. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, New York: August M. Kelley.
Koppl (ed.) (2003), Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies. Oxford: ELSEVIER Ltd.
Lachmann, L. M. (1971), The Legacy of Max Weber, Berkeley: Glendessary.
Lachmann, L. M. (1982), “Ludwig von Mises and the extension of subjectivism”, In I. M. Kirzner, Method, Process and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises, Lexington: Lexington Books.
Lachmann, L. M. (1986), The Market as Economic Process. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lachmann, L. M. (1990), “Austrian economics: a hermeneutic approach”, In Economics and Hermeneutics. London: Routledge.
Lewis , P. and J. Runde (2002), “INTERSUBJECTIVITY IN THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC WORLD”, In E. Fullbrook, Intersubjectivity in Economics (PP. 198-215). New York: Routledge.
Lewis, P. and J. Runde (2007), “Subjectivism, social structure and the possibility of socio-economic order: The case of Ludwig Lachmann”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 167-186.
Mantzavinos, C., D. C. North and S. Shariq (2004), “Learning, Institutions, and Economic Performance”, Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 75-84.
McMullen, J. S. and D. A. Shepherd (2006), “Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur”, Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132-152.
Menger, C. ({1976} 2007), Principles of Economics, (J. Dingwall, and B. F. Hoselitz, Trans.) Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Mises, L. V. (1963), Human Action, San Fransisco: Fox and Wilkes.
Mole, K. F. and M. Mole (2010), “Entrepreneurship as the structuration of individual and opportunity: A response using a critical realist perspective”, Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 230-237.
Moreno, J. (2008), “An Empirical Analysis of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Their Decisive Factors: the Case of new Spanish Firms”, International journal of Entrepreneurship, 12, 11-37.
North, D. C. (1971), “Institutional Change and Economic Growth”, Journal of Economic History, 31(1), 118-125.
North, D. C. (1981), Structure and Change in Economic History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge :Cambridge University.
North, D. C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
North, D. C. and R. Thomas (1973), The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History, New York: Cambridge University Press.
O'Driscoll, G. and M. Rizzo (1984), The Economics of Time and Ignorance, New York: Basil Blackwell.
O'Hara, P. A. (2008), “Principle of Circular and Cumulative Causation: Fusing Myrdalian and Kaldorian Growth and Development Dynamics”, Journal of Economic Issues, 42(2), 375-387.
Pettit, P. (1998), “Verstehen”, In J. B. Davis, D. W. Hands, and U. Maki, The Handbook of Economic Methodology (PP. 531-534). Gheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Rothbard, M. (1957), “In Defense of Extreme Apriorism”, Southern Economic Journal, 314-320.
Sarason, Y., T. Dean and J. F. Dillard (2006), “Entrepreneurship as the Nexus of Individual and Opportunity: A Structuration View”, Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 286-305.
Scott, W. R. (1995), Institutions and organizations, California: Sage.
Shackle, G. (1972), Epistemics and Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Shane, S. (2003), A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus, Chaltenham, U.K: Edward Elgar.
Shane, S. and S. Venkatarman (2000), “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field”, Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-26.
Storr, V. H. (2010), The facts of the social sciences are what, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Sugden, R. (1991), “Rational choice: a survey of contributions from economics and philosophy”, Economic Journal, 101, 751-85.
Tang, J., K. M. Kacmar and L. Busenitz (2012), “Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities”, Journal of Business Venturing, 77-94.
Valliere, D. (2013), “Towards a schematic theory of entrepreneurial alertness”, Journal of Business Venturing, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.08.004
Vanberg, V. (2004), “Austrian economics, evolutionary psychology and methodological dualism: Subjectivism reconsidered” In R. Koppl (ed.), Evolutionary psychology and economic theory of Advances in Austrian Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Veciana, J. M. and D. Urbano (2008), “The institutional approach to entrepreneurship: Introduction”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 365-379.
Weber, M. (1949), The Methodology of Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.
Zanotti, G. J. (2007), “Intersubjectivity, Subjectivism, Social Sciences, and the Austrian School of Economics”, Journal of Markets and Morality, 10(1), 115-141.